Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Female soldier testifies about recruitment in Fort Hood prostitution ring case


AUSTIN, Texas — Sgt. 1st Class Gregory McQueen knew the female soldier, then a 20-year-old private second class, had been sexually assaulted while training at a different Army post. As a low-level coordinator in Fort Hood’s sexual assault and harassment program — and one of her commanders — it was McQueen’s job to prevent this type of thing from happening again.


Instead, the woman testified Tuesday, McQueen and another female soldier invited her to a home for drinks last year and tried to recruit her into a prostitution ring at Fort Hood, telling her that she could make “$400 to $500 a night.” When the other soldier left the room, the woman said, McQueen kissed and touched her until she pushed him away.


“I was getting really nervous, getting really angry, but knowing that I can’t fight a sergeant,” said the woman, testifying in a case that has focused national attention on the issue of military sexual assault.


An Article 32 hearing — the military court equivalent of a grand jury proceeding, in which evidence is presented to determine whether a case will go to trial — began Tuesday for McQueen. Prosecutors said McQueen ran a prostitution ring at Fort Hood for a month or two that took advantage of cash-strapped female soldiers and connected them with higher-ranking officers.


He faces charges of pandering, conspiracy, maltreatment of a subordinate, abusive sexual contact, adultery and detrimental conduct.


The charges against McQueen and another sergeant convicted last year in the Fort Hood case helped spur a push to revamp the military’s rules on prosecuting sexual assault cases. Earlier this year, the U.S. Senate considered — then blocked — a bill that would have taken the prosecution of sexual assault cases out of the military chain of command.


One Pentagon study showed that almost 90 percent of military sexual assaults aren’t reported. Another Pentagon report released last month showed that of the assaults that were reported last year, less than 10 percent went to trial.


The woman who testified Tuesday said she refused to join the prostitution ring and tried to forget that the incident had ever happened.


“I tried to block it out,” she said.


Another woman — a private first class who had tried to recruit that female soldier with McQueen — told the court that McQueen drew her into the prostitution ring after she told him that she was having financial difficulties. Her husband had left her and her 3-year-old son and had cleaned out their bank account. She was 20 when McQueen approached her in February 2013, she said.


McQueen told her there were other ways to make money and arranged to meet her at her on-base home that night, she said. He told her that he could connect her with higher-ranking officers who were willing to pay to have sex with her.


McQueen then asked her to “act out what (she) would do,” and he had sex with her, she said. He took a picture of her while she was undressed. The woman told the court that McQueen would show the picture to other service members to see if they were interested in paying her for sex.


The private told the court that she met with Master Sgt. Brad Grimes at a La Quinta Inn in Killeen in 2013. Grimes was found guilty in a December court-martial of conspiring to patronize a prostitute and solicitation to commit adultery. He was demoted to sergeant first class and received a letter of reprimand.


Three noncommissioned officers in McQueen’s battalion testified that he approached them and mentioned that he knew a woman who would have sex for money. Two of them said McQueen showed them pictures of the woman, sometimes in provocative poses.


“He said that he had a female that was willing to do anything I wanted for $75,” a master sergeant told the court. The man said he was concerned by the exchange and told a superior officer.


McQueen’s hearing is expected to continue Wednesday. The investigating officer in the case will recommend whether the case should proceed to a full court-martial.



Father of 1st US Afghanistan fatality blasts prisoner swap with Taliban


WASHINGTON — The father of America's first fatality in Afghanistan denounced the Obama administration for releasing Taliban prisoners that he holds responsible for his son’s death, saying the move was a slap in the face to every American who died in the war against terror.


Johnny "Mike" Spann, part of a CIA paramilitary unit, was killed Nov. 25, 2001 during an uprising by Taliban prisoners near Mazar-e-Sharif a month after President George W. Bush ordered U.S. forces into Afghanistan to punish al-Qaida and its allies for the 9/11 attacks in the United States.


Two of the five Taliban prisoners released last weekend from Guantanamo prison in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl were present during the uprising at Qala-i-Jangi prison, according to U.S. documents obtained by The Washington Post. They were Mullah Mohammad Fazl and Mullah Norullah Noori.


Spann's father, Johnny Spann, told Stars and Stripes that his first reaction to the exchange was "disappointment and disbelief.



“I couldn’t believe what I was hearing,” Spann recalled. “It’s a slap in the face to everybody that’s died in this war on terror... Every American that’s lost their life to the hands of the Taliban and al-Qaida — this is a slap in their face to know that we had five high-powered leaders that we just turned loose.”


Details of the two mullahs' roles in the uprising have never been publicly spelled out by the U.S.


Nevertheless, Spann, 65, of Winfield, Alabama, is convinced the two were responsible even if they weren’t the ones that pulled the trigger.


“I’m convinced from all the reports and all the information that I have that that was a planned event from the night before, and [the Taliban] knew exactly what they were going to do and when they were going to do it. And I think that those two men were part of it — part of the planning,” he said.


“Everybody that was inside there had a hand in it. Nobody tried to protect Mike’s life — not a single soul in there tried to. Everybody in there was hell-bent on killing Americans... Mike lost his life inside Qala-i-Jangi, and yes, I hold everybody responsible that was inside that prison for Mike’s death... Everybody inside Qala-i-Jangi has blood on their hands and was a part of it,” he said.


Questions about the 2001 uprising have been raised again since the release of Bergdahl, 28, of Hailey, Idaho.


Bergdahl went missing in June 2009 in Paktika province in southeastern Afghanistan while serving with a unit of the 25th Infantry Division from Fort Richardson, Alaska.


Some former members of Bergdahl's unit have accused him of deserting and that American lives were lost looking for him.


Bergdahl is currently at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, where he was sent soon after his release.


Spann is withholding judgment on Bergdahl for now. But even if Bergdahl wasn’t a deserter, Spann thinks the trade wasn’t worth it.


“I see no equality in what was traded for Bergdahl. I don’t see no equality as far as value there,” Spann said. “I mean [the detainees] were very valuable to us as far as they were responsible for a lot of American lives... They weren’t the average Joe out there carrying a rifle on the battlefield. They were leaders. They were the people that were planning things.”


Obama has defended his decision, saying America had a "sacred duty" to ensure that no U.S. servicemember was left behind on the battlefield.


Spann thinks the U.S. government should try to get American prisoners of war freed, but he says the Taliban can’t be dealt with like a normal enemy at the end of a conflict.


“Certainly the U.S. needs to always work for the release of those [American] prisoners,” Spann said. “If we knew that we were making a deal with a responsible group of people and we knew that they were going to lay down their arms and they were not going to continue to try to kill Americans, then you might consider that to some extent. But now, we don’t have any agreement like that in this war with al-Qaeda and the Taliban. This war on terror is nowhere near over.”


Spann also thinks the swap sends the wrong signal and will put more Americans in danger.


“[Our enemies] know that they can get an American and they can hold them hostage, and at some point we’ll trade,” he said.


Still, Spann can sympathize with Bergdahl’s parents, who have made a high-profile effort to push for their son’s release. They appeared next to Obama in the Rose Garden on Saturday after Obama announced the swap.


“If it was my son, would I want him home? Why yeah. But... that’s a reason that parents and kin folks can’t be on the jury and they can’t be the judge because they would be biased... You can ask a parent, ‘Well, if that was your son, would you want him home?’ Well, of course I’d want him home. But if your son committed murder, would you still want him home? Yeah, the majority of the people [you asked] would want him to not go to jail... But that’s not the way this system works. They’re not the judge, and your kin folks don’t get to decide that,” Spann said.


Spann thinks Obama doesn’t understand the raw emotions people in his position feel.


“I’d almost bet you that if one of President Obama’s children had been killed in this war or on 9/11, he would have a different reflection and a different attitude as far as any leniency that he would give to al-Qaida and Taliban leaders who have been active in the death of Americans,” he said.


Spann thinks about Mike and the 9/11 attacks all the time.


“I’ve got a big picture in the front of my office of the towers smoking and falling with the airplane sticking out of it. Every day I see that. I’ve got several pictures of my son throughout my office. So it’s constantly on my mind that I remember him and I remember those people that died on 9/11, because when I walk into the front door, the first thing I see is that photo of the towers,” he said. “[My] disbelief is we would give five people back that were instrumental... in the deaths of thousands of American people all the way back to 9/11.”


Spann thinks the released detainees will try to kill more Americans, and he mocks the Obama administration’s assurances that measures are in place to prevent them from doing that.


“I don’t think any responsible American will look at this situation and think that they’re going to go to Qatar [where they’ll spend the next year under the supervision of the Qatari government] and Qatar is going to keep them under some kind of security measures where they’re not going to be able to have any kind of influence on the Talban and al-Qaida movements throughout the world. I just don’t believe that... I just don’t think they were rehabilitated. I think that’s sort of a joke for us to think that or even suppose that they have been. And I think they’ll be out there costing more American lives or more American deaths,” he said.


harper.jon@stripes.com

Twitter: @JHarperStripes



Bergdahl needs, deserves time to adjust, counselors, ex-POWs say


WASHINGTON — The man at the center of a raging controversy over his captivity by the Taliban likely isn’t yet aware of the tumult he has precipitated.


Military officials and experts on the prisoner-of-war experience say Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl has been in a protective bubble ever since his May 31 release after five years of Taliban captivity.


Bergdahl, 28, an Idaho native, was exchanged for five senior Taliban prisoners who were transferred from the Guantanamo Bay detention facility to Qatar. He’s being evaluated at the military hospital in Landstuhl, Germany.



In part, he’s being shielded from anger directed at him, as critics — including troops who served with him — charge him with deserting his base and endangering his comrades in arms, a number of whom were killed or injured in subsequent searches.


But he’s also being shielded from the damaging disorientation that can occur when long-held captives return to society without proper reorientation.


“When you have prolonged captivity — five years — someone is going to be a little bit like Rip Van Winkle,” said Dr. Frank Ochberg, a pioneering psychiatrist in the field of trauma recovery who helped develop key concepts, including that of post-traumatic stress. “It’s a slice of your life that has been taken out.”


But lost time may pale in significance to other damaging effects of being a prisoner of war, Ochberg said. Although it’s not yet known what Berghdahl might have experienced, other survivors of long-term captivity have suffered ill effects of prolonged isolation, mistreatment and horrifying experiences, leading to the onset of painful and potentially crippling post-traumatic stress injury, he said.


So what’s happening to Bergdahl now?


Although the military has declined to release specifics about his physical and emotional state, officials have detailed the U.S. military’s three-phase POW “reintegration” program, which Bergdahl entered as soon as special forces troops took him from his Taliban captors in a pre-arranged handoff.



The program’s roots lie in the 1973 return of hundreds of POWs in “Operation Homecoming” and has been fine-tuned using medical and psychological research done in the intervening decades.


“Reintegration has been going on for years,” said Arwen Consaul, a spokeswoman for U.S. Army South, which treats returned Army POWs as well as other troops and civilians held in U.S. Southern Command. “Since the Vietnam POWs came back, we realized there needed to be a process to get them back into society and be able to cope with what they’d been through. Through years of studying POWs and talking to POWs, we’ve been able to continually refine our process.”


Phase 1 of reintegration begins as soon as a POW is released and involves initial medical treatment and psychological support in the theater where the release occurs. Each phase of the process involves debriefing of the returned POW, focusing especially on any tactical information the returnee may be able to immediately provide to the military.


Bergdahl is currently in Phase 2 of the process, known as “decompression,” which experts say can last from three days to a few weeks. For Bergdahl, this phase is taking place at Landstuhl. Although stable, he requires nutritional care after years of bad food, as well as other medical work military officials have refused to elucidate.


Vietnam POWs released during Operation Homecoming underwent a three-day period at Clark Air Base in the Philippines that bears some similarity to the current decompression regimen. It was a welcome step that eased the way back to life in the United States, one former POW said.


“It would not be a wise thing to do, I think, to take a guy and throw him back in with his family before the military has had a chance to talk with him or debrief him,” said retired Navy Capt. Mike McGrath, a pilot who spent almost six years in a North Vietnamese prison and was tortured after being shot down in 1967.


But it’s not just talking that Bergdahl is likely undergoing, McGrath said. After five years of arduous captivity, he may have medical needs similar to those of the Vietnam POWs.


“We had a lot of guys missing teeth, from beatings or rocks in the food or whatever,” he said. “When we got to Clark, they had a whole bank of dentists ready. They were taking care of periodontal disease, and if you had broken out teeth they were making temporary bridges so you could meet your family with no teeth missing. That might seem pretty small to you, but to guys meeting their families for the first time in years, it meant a lot.”


Other prisoners were suffering from parasites, long-term infections and open wounds that needed treatment, McGrath said.


During decompression, according to an Army fact sheet, former POWs are attended to by team that includes medical personnel and at least one psychologist trained in survival, escape, evasion and resistance. The phase also includes operational and intelligence briefings.


Pentagon officials have declined to offer details on the specific nature of Bergdahl’s debriefings. But if the sergeant engaged in misconduct in connection with his disappearance from his base in Paktika province in 2009, he may be subject to discipline, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey said Tuesday on his Facebook page. “Our Army’s leaders will not look away from misconduct if it occurred,” he said.


But, echoing other Pentagon statements, Dempsey added that simply caring for Bergdahl and his family after a horrific ordeal is the priority now.


Ochberg, who has spent a career treating and interviewing military and civilian survivors of trauma, said he trusts Dempsey and other leaders that Bergdahl is being treated as a patient rather than a suspect. Although the term “debriefing” may sound intimidating, it can be a key part of the healing process, he said.


The first step is to not be too intrusive, he said.


“When I am a psychiatrist talking to someone who has been through quite an ordeal, rather than just talking about what’s going on with them, it’s important to establish a good relationship — to have a conversation rather than an interrogation, and be cautious in exploring traumatic and painful events,” he said.


In the right hands, debriefing is positive, he said. Research on victims of conflict who’d been given a chance to tell their story to sympathetic listeners in tribunals overseas shows they had better psychological outcomes than those who did not speak about it, Ochberg said.


Now is not the time to try to build a disciplinary or legal case against Bergdahl, he said.


“I assume that what is going on now is medical and is what the secretary of defense has said and the president has said it is,” he said. “If it turns out that the investigation shows that anybody tried to take advantage of a weakened state, I would consider that a miscarriage of justice.”


In Phase 3 of reintegration, which will occur at San Antonio Military Medical Center, Bergdahl will be reunited with family and begin to move back slowly into normal life in America.


“Families play a critical role in assisting the returnee in gaining control and predictability over their circumstances,” according to an Army fact sheet. “The key is to include the family in the reintegration planning to ensure they understand the benefits of the process.”


During this final phase, which officials said can last weeks or longer, Bergdahl will be attended to by a large, multidisciplinary team that has been monitoring his case and planning for his return for years in twice-yearly meetings, said Consaul of Army South.


Among them are planners, air crew, chaplains, medical personnel, public affairs officials and attorneys, she said.


“We want this to be as seamless for the family as possible so they can focus on the reintegration process,” she said.


The Bergdahl family, Ochberg said, has appeared as a model of love and support throughout their son’s long captivity. So has his hometown of Hailey, Idaho, he said.


A warm homecoming can make a difference, Ochberg said. But so can a harsh one, which Bergdahl may soon experience as questions about why he became a POW in the first place heat up. At some point in his three-phase reintegration, he’ll have to be exposed to what many of his former comrades are saying about him now.


“We know from bitter experience that a poor reception after military service reduces the psychological health of the veteran, and that a warm reception helps,” he said.


Regarding Bergdahl: “There’s a lot of assumption and presumption, and it’s unfortunate from a medical point of view when an individual becomes the focus of a raging controversy,” Ochberg said.


carroll.chris@stripes.com

Twitter: @ChrisCarroll_



Fort Bragg paratrooper who died in airborne training accident was using newer parachute


The Fort Bragg paratrooper who died Friday during an airborne training exercise was using a newer parachute that has proven safer than its earlier counterpart, officials said.


Soldiers using the T-11 parachute are less likely to be injured than those using the older T-10D, according to an Army study of Fort Bragg airborne operations.


Despite its record, the T-11 now has been associated with at least two fatal falls since it was introduced on Fort Bragg in 2009. One other death took place with a third, less common type of parachute during that time span.


The latest death occurred at Holland Drop Zone when Sgt. Shaina B. Schmigel, a soldier with the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, was killed during a training exercise.


The cause of Schmigel's death is under investigation, and officials have not said if the parachute played a role.


In 2011, the Army suspended the use of the T-11 after a training death on Fort Bragg.


Sgt. Jamal Clay, a soldier with the 82nd Airborne's 3rd Brigade Combat Team, fell to his death when his T-11 parachute malfunctioned in June of that year. Army officials said Clay did not activate his reserve parachute, and a safety investigation board determined the T-11 failed because of debris within the parachute and improper packing.


The T-11 was reintroduced in March 2012, with Fort Bragg's then-commander, Lt. Gen. Frank Helmick, being the first to use the parachute to show leaders' confidence.


Schmigel was using the T-11 parachute, which replaced the T-10D parachute that had been used by airborne forces since 1952.


Compared with the T-10D, injuries were 43 percent less likely to occur with the T-11, according to a study by the U.S. Army Public Health Command.


Officials with the command based at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, collected data on injured jumpers from drop zones and from medical records.


It was the third study that compared the two types of parachutes, with all three finding that the T-11 resulted in fewer injuries.


The latest study, which analyzed data from more than 130,000 jumps, took place from June 2010 to November 2013, with most data coming from Fort Bragg's drop zones.


The study, released in February, looked at 1,101 injuries and found that soldiers were injured on average 8.4 times per 1,000 jumps.


Most of those injuries - about 88 percent - were associated with ground impact, but were less common with the newer parachutes.


Paratroopers using the T-10D were injured 9.1 times per 1,000 jumps, according to the study. Injuries occurred 5.2 times per 1,000 jumps in the T-11.


Other factors that made jumps more dangerous include jumping at night, carrying a full combat load or jumping in higher winds or higher temperatures.


Controlling for those factors, the Army study found the T-11 still was safer for every category except entanglements.


The risks of entanglement and injury from entanglement were higher with the T-11, according to officials, but the incidents were rare, regardless of the parachute.


Entanglements occurred in .51 per 1,000 jumps in the T-11 and .22 per 1,000 jumps in the T-10D.


Armywide, parachuting injuries are the sixth leading cause of hospitalizations among active-duty soldiers, officials said.


But injury rates have improved over the decades.


During World War II, there were 21 to 27 injuries per 1,000 jumps, according to officials. The 82nd Airborne's historical injury rate is 11 per 1,000 jumps.


The most common injuries on Fort Bragg over the 31/2 year study were concussions, ankle sprains and lower back sprains, with concussions making up more than a third of all injuries.


Fractured or broken bones accounted for about 13percent of all injuries.


The T-11 was developed over several years in response to a need for Army parachutes to carry heavier loads.


The T-10D held a maximum weight of 350 pounds and was developed during a time when the average load of a soldier and his equipment was 300 pounds, according to officials.


By 1989, when paratroopers jumped into Panama as part of Operation Just Cause, 4 percent of all paratroopers carried more than 350 pounds.


More than a decade later, during combat jumps into Iraq and Afghanistan, paratrooper loads averaged between 327 and 380 pounds.


The T-11, which began replacing the T-10D in 2010, can hold 400-pound loads.


The parachute also causes a slower decent, with paratroopers falling an average of 19 feet per second, compared with 22 feet per second in the T-10D.


brooksd@fayobserver.com



Marine-turned-actor puts missed chances in past and savors success


For a while, Adam Driver felt like he was doomed to a life of missed opportunities.


Of course, for an Emmy-nominated actor named one of GQ’s “Men of the Year,” that’s not true anymore — but ask him about his role in the new “Star Wars” film and it quickly becomes apparent that he does not want to screw this one up.


A misfit growing up in small town Mishawaka, Indiana, Driver was drawn to performing from an early age, landing regular roles in high school plays and singing in the choir at the church where his stepfather was pastor.


But mediocre grades kept him from getting accepted into acting school after graduating in 2001. With big talk to match his big dreams, he set off for Los Angeles to try to break into acting the old-fashioned way. Instead, his car broke down halfway there and, out of money, he was forced to retreat back home.


“It’s hard to come back after telling everyone ‘I’m outta here,’ ” he says.


A new hope


After stints selling vacuums door-to-door and other odd jobs, Driver was among the first to go see a Marine Corps recruiter after the Sept. 11 attacks, signing up for the infantry.


His new hope was to test himself in the toughest environment he could think of.


After boot camp and joining his unit at Camp Pendleton, California, Driver became an 81mm mortar man assigned to the weapons platoon with 1st Battalion, 1st Marines. As his unit trained for war, Driver says he got exactly what he was looking for.


“Not too often in the civilian world do you get put into these high-stakes situations with a bunch of friends. You’re seeing people at their strongest and most vulnerable,” he says.


Still, there were missed opportunities. One of Driver’s greatest regrets: missing a chance to meet R. Lee Ermey, the actor who portrayed the iconic drill instructor in the film “Full Metal Jacket,” who — an actual veteran himself — has gone on to a slew of other roles.


While the Marine Corps had tamped down Driver’s acting ambitions, it had not killed them. He was eager to meet another Marine who had made it in the business.


“He came out to where we were training but stayed in the rear. When we got back everyone was very excited, and we were very pissed,” Driver says.


And then came the mountain-biking accident. One bad turn and his sternum was shattered. He fought to stay in, but after less than three years in uniform, Lance Cpl. Driver was forced out with a medical discharge, just as his unit was preparing to deploy downrange.


“I felt like I hadn’t completed my four years. That always kind of bothers me,” he says.


More than anything, he felt like he’d let himself and his buddies down.


The actor strikes back


Driver decided to channel that energy into a renewed bid at acting — forging his own opportunities.


After a year of hard work at the University of Indianapolis, he’d assembled enough of an academic résumé to get accepted into The Juilliard School, the elite special ops of performing arts schools in New York City.


“After I got out, I suddenly realized that I could handle civilian problems. They all seemed pretty small by comparison.”


If worse comes to worst, he remembers telling himself, I’ll live in Central Park and survive eating bread out of Panera’s Dumpster. I’ll survive. What could possibly be more challenging than what I’ve already done? Which now I realize was an illusion because obviously there’s lots of things to readjust to, and civilian life is tricky. But at the time I felt very confident and at the very least, anyway, knew I wasn’t going to die pursuing acting.”


In a lot of ways, demands of Juilliard came easy for him, classmate Joanne Tucker says.


“Juilliard is basically boot camp for actors. You’re there pretty much 24 hours a day. I think his military training prepared him better for his career as an actor than anything else could have,” she says. “He will never show up unprepared. He will never show up late.”


But, she says, it was apparent Driver was struggling in other ways.


A phantom menace


“He was staying in touch with his buddies who were going overseas,” Tucker says. “It was an emotional struggle for him to not have gone with them. There were a lot of complicated feelings around that that he was still working through.”


The acting training, Driver says, became a form of therapy.


“I was getting exposed to characters and playwrights and plays who had nothing to do with the military that were articulating my military experience better than I was able to at the time,” he says.


He was surprised to find himself armed with words.


“For the first time I was able to use my words, as opposed to so many times in the military when I had feelings I couldn’t express. Language was never emphasized ... There just wasn’t much emphasis on explaining a collective experience,” he says.


Tucker says it wasn’t long before Driver was pushing to take that gift of words well spoken back to the military.


After three years of wrangling and organizing while still at Juilliard, Driver put together a performance troupe and a proposal for the USO. “It was almost immediately rejected,” he wrote in the Juilliard Journal at the time. “The actors didn’t fit their celebrity model, the language used in the monologues was too explicit, and theater didn’t fit the military demographic. ‘Marines don’t want to see skits,’ I was told; ‘they want to see the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders.’ ”


Return of the Marine


Undeterred, Driver put together a Spartan squad of about a dozen actors for a bare-bones, stripped-down mash-up of edgy monologues and jazz for a 2008 performance back on his old turf at Camp Pendleton.


“It was so strange being back there as a civilian, but the response was amazing,” Driver says.


That’s when Arts in the Armed Forces was born. Now a nonprofit, six years later it’s still going strong, with regular performances around the country.


“We still try to make it as approachable as possible to show that theater is something that can happen anywhere, anytime. That it doesn’t have to be this high-brow intellectual thing that’s only for the elite,” says Tucker, who is now the foundation’s creative director and, as it happens, married Driver about a year ago.


The performances are still stripped down, with no costumes, sets or fancy lighting, just powerful words performed by an ever-transforming cast drawn from TV, movies and Broadway.


In December, a group performed for troops in Europe stuck on duty over the holidays. More recently, they performed for injured troops, their families and staff at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.


The hope, Tucker says, is “to provide something nourishing, uplifting and thought-provoking. Any arts experience should move you in some way.”


Hitting hyperspace


Meanwhile, of course, Driver’s career has taken off faster, some might say, than the Millennium Falcon making the jump into hyperspace.


Driver was nominated for an Emmy for his role HBO’s “Sex in the City”-meets-“Friends” series “Girls,” in which he plays the quirky on-again, off again boyfriend to Lena Dunham’s character.


After the show’s first season, he was named one of GQ’s Men of the Year in 2012.


A growing list of credits includes the role of telegraph operator in Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln,” a scene-stealing role in the Coen brothers’ “Inside Llewyn Davis” and a leading part in the Australian epic “Tracks.”


Driver’s very first big screen role was in 2009, just after he graduated from Juilliard, starring in an action short dubbed “Archangel” in which he fights it out, almost Matrix-style, with a leather-clad, ass-kicking hottie with powers from another dimension.


If you’re wondering what Driver will bring to a big-action space opera such as “Star Wars,” this is a good place to start.


“He was great to work with,” says the film’s director, James Lawler, who discovered Driver after checking in with a few friends at casting agencies who had seen Driver perform at Juilliard.


“He’s a very physical guy. He moved really well. He’s very convincing,” Lawler says. “He was really throwing himself around in that fight scene. He got bruised up pretty badly. He was probably bleeding half the time we were shooting but was a good sport about it all.”


Lawler says he’s not at all surprised to see Driver land a big role in “Star Wars.”


“He can tackle anything, really, because he’s such an intelligent performer. He’s a very smart guy. And that’s where, in my humble opinion, good acting comes from — people who can really wrap their head around a character and tell a convincing story and get inside a role emotionally and physically. He does that really, really well.”


But it’s Driver’s mysterious role in the upcoming “Star Wars” installment that has everyone buzzing.


The Droids you're looking for


Directed by J.J. Abrams, “Star Wars: Episode VII” will be set 30 years after the Rebel Alliance restored balance to a galaxy far, far away in “Return of the Jedi.” “Jedi” was released in 1983 — as it turns out, the same year Driver was born.


In a photo recently released by Abrams, the cast is circled up for their first read-through in London, where much of the movie will be filmed. Driver is wearing a dark hoodie over a dark crew neck, with dark pants and dark sneakers.


He’s seen sandwiched between British actor John Boyega and scriptwriter Lawrence Kasdan, who also penned the screenplay for “The Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi.” R2-D2 peeks out from a freshly-opened crate.


“We are so excited to finally share the cast of ‘Star Wars: Episode VII,’ ” says Abrams in a statement accompanying the photo. “It is both thrilling and surreal to watch the beloved original cast and these brilliant new performers come together to bring this world to life, once again. We start shooting in a couple of weeks, and everyone is doing their best to make the fans proud.”


The movie is slated for worldwide release on Dec. 18, 2015.


The characteristically tight-lipped Abrams has said the next chapter will star a trio of new young leads — he hasn’t specified which new young actors those are — who will join much of the original cast that helped engrave the saga into the national psyche. Along with Driver and Boyega, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Domhnall Gleeson and Max von Sydow will join original stars Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew and Kenny Baker.


And that’s about all Abrams has to say.


It’s been widely reported Driver will play the franchise’s next uber-villain. For a series that made Darth Vader a household name, those are some big black boots to fill.


Other reports, however, pin Driver as the son of Han Solo and Princess Leia.


“Star Wars” creator George Lucas sketched out the next trilogy years ago. Given his penchant for redemption twists, Driver’s role very well could be mixture of both. The son of Han and Leia — a Sith Lord?


Quoting “one of our many Rebel spies,” fan site Jedi News says Driver is “playing the son of Han and Leia, and it seems he will be seduced to the Dark Side, and a main plot point for the movie will be their attempt to rescue him.”


Coffee, villains, using the Force


Ask Driver who his favorite villain is, and he suddenly gets cagey.


“The guy at the coffee shop who screws up my order,” he says after a long pause. “It’s an actual guy.”


Ask him to describe any villain that he’s played to date and he takes even longer.


“That’s hard because I don’t think anyone is really a villain,” he says. “I don’t think of any character as a villain because then you judge them and distance yourself from them.”


While his favorite movie as a kid was “Predator,” Driver says he was huge fan of the “Star Wars” saga.


“Oh yeah, big time.”


But he knows better than to say anything about his upcoming role. This will not become a missed opportunity based on anything he says to the media.


“I just can’t. I’m pretty sure people would rappel from the ceiling, grab me and take me away,” he says with a laugh.


Besides, this Marine appreciates the value of opsec when it comes to good storytelling.


“It’s a very secretive set. And I’m totally all about that. I’m one of those people who closes my eyes during movie trailers because I don’t want to know anything,” Driver says.


In a recent interview with Driver’s “Full Metal Jacket” idol Ermey, OFFduty asked the actor if he had any advice for a fellow Marine poised to play the villain in the new “Star Wars.” He did.


Was Driver interested in hearing Ermey’s advice?


“Sure,” says Driver, with a measured pause. And, as if to clarify that he wasn’t confirming or denying anything, adds, “but who says I’m playing a villain? You can’t believe everything you read on the Internet.”


Still, he was eager to hear anything Ermey had to pass along.


“Be memorable,” was Ermey’s message to Driver. “More than any other character, you want to play the villain so that he’s the first thing people are talking about as they’re leaving the theater.”


“Huh,” says Driver, with another thoughtful pause, “that’s very nice.”


Driver says he’s just glad to be a part of it all.


“It surreal,” he says. “Being there for that table read and the idea of working with these people who I’ve grown up watching, and suddenly, ‘Oh yeah, there’s something I have to say here’ — it was almost too much to process. So it’s not even worth trying to process it. I’m just trying to focus on this little thing and to take it in moments.


“For whoever that character might be,” he says with a staccato laugh — “good or bad.”



More U.S. base consolidations on the way in Europe


STUTTGART, Germany — Recommendations for more base closures and consolidations in Europe will be submitted to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel in a matter of weeks as part of an ongoing effort to shed unneeded facilities on the Continent, according to the Defense Department.


Last month, the Pentagon announced it will close 21 outdated facilities in Europe — mainly housing and recreation complexes — for an annual savings of $60 million. But that is just the start, with the next round of closures expected to take aim at actual military installations as part of the European Infrastructure Consolidation review — a “BRAC-like” analysis launched more than a year ago.


The primary “capacity analysis,” which involves recommendations from each service on ways to consolidate in Europe, is expected to be on Hagel’s desk within two months, if not earlier, according to a Defense Department official.


The study, which began well before Russia’s recent intervention in Ukraine, comes at an awkward time for the military. On the one hand, the Pentagon wants to find efficiencies and demonstrate to Congress a willingness to downsize overseas. Lawmakers have long asserted that Europe bases should be cut before even discussing the possibility of unpopular base closures on U.S. soil. At the same time, Russia’s actions in Ukraine has complicated downsizing plans as the U.S. and its allies contend with what Gen. Philip Breedlove, the top U.S. commander in Europe, has called a new security paradigm on the Continent.


“The events in Ukraine have changed the assumptions underlying European security,” Breedlove, NATO’s supreme allied commander, said last month. “NATO must undergo a strategic adaptation to address Russia’s use of snap exercises, cyberactivities and covert operations to achieve their state objectives. With this fundamental change is our security environment, we must transform.”


Russia’s annexation of Crimea has been a source of particular angst in former Warsaw Pact states particularly in Poland, where leaders have indicated a desire for a permanent U.S. presence in the country. Breedlove said NATO shouldn’t rule out positioning forces in eastern Europe in an effort to realign alliance military power closer to potential hot spots.


However, a budget-challenged Pentagon is faced with the difficult, and perhaps contradictory, task of showing a renewed commitment to European security in the face of a more assertive Russia while simultaneously shrinking the size of its footprint in Europe.


John Deni, a professor at the U.S. Army War College and expert on the military mission in Europe, says the U.S. should be cautious about giving up too much real estate in connection with any base realignment.


“There might be some room for consolidation, but that needs to be weighed against the fact that we diminish our strategic flexibility,” Deni said. “Once we close a facility we are never getting it back and we have no way of predicting what future crises might be and where you need them. If there is room for consolidation it will be on the margins of what we have left.”


An increased reliance on rotational forces in Europe could be one way to offset a smaller permanent forward presence or reduced network of bases. On Tuesday, the White House annonced that President Barack Obama would seek $1 billion from Congress for a new “European Reassurance Initiative,” which would aim to increase troop rotations on the Continent and help train allies.


Meanwhile, it will likely be several months before final decisions on the base structure are announced publicly, given a bureaucratic process that involves coordination with respective host nations.


But there are already some indications of the direction DOD wants to go in areas of closure and consolidation. For instance, the department’s 2015 budget request includes funding for a new intelligence center at RAF Croughton, England — a move that would result in the closure of both RAF Alconbury and RAF Molesworth, according to budget documents. Those plans are on hold by Congress pending the conclusion of the Pentagon’s consolidation review.


Others areas likely to be scrutinized are Army bases in Germany, which still account for most of the military footprint in Europe. Two garrisons — one in Schweinfurt and one in Bamberg — are already slated to close in the coming year. The U.S. Army’s Baumholder garrison, which over the years has frequently been mentioned as a place for potential closure, could get a second look.


But while much remains unknown about the future base map in Europe, advocates for a strong forward presence in Europe say recent Russian aggression should be an argument against sweeping cuts and closures.


“For those that think we’ve cut enough from Europe, the timing is obviously helpful,” Deni said.“It makes sense to really take stock of where we are with the remaining force structure and infrastructure, but in the past, I think a lot of this has been budget-driven and not strategy-driven. I think this (crisis with Russia) reminds us we’re still going to retain a strategic interest in Europe.”


vandiver.john@stripes.com



US sending 650 troops to support D-Day commemorations


KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany — In what has come to be something of a tradition this time of year, the American military is again preparing to invade Normandy.


The U.S. is sending roughly 650 troops from across the U.S. and Europe to take part in more than two dozen events commemorating the 70th anniversary of D-Day, the start of the Allied invasion that led to Germany’s defeat in World War II.


Soldiers from at least eight U.S.-based units will serve as color guards and speakers at commemorations in towns and places that their predecessors fought in or liberated in the early days of the Allied invasion, according to U.S. European Command. Among the stateside units represented are the 82nd and 101st Airborne divisions; the 75th Ranger Regiment; the 1st, 4th and 29th Infantry divisions; the 1st Battalion, 507th Parachute Infantry Regiment; and 4th Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, which traces its lineage back to the 1st Battalion, 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment.


Troops from some of those units and others from Europe will re-enact one of the most heroic and harrowing events of the invasion: parachuting out of planes in a massive, multinational jump on June 8.


Local villages and organizations will stage hundreds of events before and after that, from fireworks and movie screenings to concerts and parades.


The U.S. military is sending troops to just a few dozen of these events, the biggest of them a ceremony June 6 at the Normandy American Cemetery, where almost 11,000 American dead and missing are memorialized, to honor the Americans who fought and died in the Normandy campaign. Some 200 American servicemembers will take part in the ceremony, including an honor guard from the Europe-based 529th Military Police salute battery, paratroops from the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team and a flight of F-15s, which will fly in a missing man formation.


“We’ll have flyovers on a lot of the ceremonies,” U.S. European Command spokesman John Tomassi said. “Not every one, but I would say a good majority of them.”


U.S. participation in many of the events will be modest, though the units attending will have symbolic significance. In one, about 25 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division will attend a ceremony at a memorial honoring Pfc. Charles DeGlopper, an 82nd soldier who died in the battle to take La Fière Bridge and was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.


Army Rangers will again stand at Pointe du Hoc, where their predecessors scaled the cliffs to seize the high ground where German forces had huge gun emplacements. In Colleville-sur-Mer, where there is a large monument to the 1st Infantry Division, soldiers of the Big Red One will join locals in paying their respects. The 101st will have soldiers in Chef du Pont, where it was once tasked with seizing a strategic bridge.


U.S. European Command doesn’t yet have a final list of events in Normandy where American forces will be present in an official capacity, but a preliminary list is available on its website, www.eucom.mil. An even more comprehensive calendar of events is available at dday-overlord.com, a nonprofit organization.


millham.matthew@stripes.com

Twitter: @MattMillham