Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Air Force Academy training aircraft lands off course


48 minutes ago




No injuries were reported after a T-53A aircraft conducting flight training operations landed off course Wednesday on Air Force Academy grounds.


Academy spokesman Warthen Meade said the aircraft landed about 9 a.m. on the north part of the military installation near Interstate 25 with a student and an instructor on board. Neither person was injured.


The T-35A is a single-engine aircraft used by the Air Force Academy for pilot training. The civilian equivalent is the Cirrus SR-20.


Air Force Academy officials said the incident remains under investigation.




Fort Bragg brigade 1 of 3 units to deploy to Afghanistan


Another Fort Bragg brigade will deploy to Afghanistan this fall.


The Department of Defense announced today that the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade would deploy later this year.


The brigade, part of the 82nd Airborne Division, will send about 1,725 soldiers to Afghanistan.


It was one of three units identified for an upcoming deployment by the Pentagon. The others were the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, which will send about 1,000 soldiers, and the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, which will send about 900 soldiers.


A length for the deployments was not announced. The 82nd Airborne soldiers will join about a thousand paratroopers with the division's 1st and 2nd Brigade Combat Teams already in Afghanistan.


They will provide helicopter support to coalition troops throughout the country.


A deployment of a smaller group of 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade soldiers had already been announced. Those soldiers, about 70 in all, are leaving Fort Bragg for Afghanistan early Thursday.


Their numbers are included in the 1,725 figure, according to officials.


"The Pegasus Brigade is prepared to conduct aviation operations during this critical transition point in the war in Afghanistan," said Col. Mike Musiol, the brigade commander. "Through a robust training schedule, our aviation task forces have meticulously trained to meet the challenging environment of Afghanistan and support coalition forces on the ground."


Those soldiers are part of Company C, 3rd General Support Aviation Battalion.


They were originally set to deploy last Saturday, but their departure was delayed because of weather that prevented a commercial airliner from reaching Fort Bragg.


The deployment will mark the third time the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade has been sent to Afghanistan and the sixth deployment to either Iraq or Afghanistan since 2002.


"While we continue to focus on the deployment and mission ahead, the support to our families will remain a top priority," Musiol said. "With our past experience in (Operation Enduring Freedom), there is no doubt the 82nd CAB is the right organization to take this forward as we drawdown our footprint across Afghanistan."


The 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade was last in Afghanistan in 2012.


After it deploys, it will likely serve alongside several other Fort Bragg units.


The 18th Airborne Corps is serving as the core of several key commands in Afghanistan and the 1st Theater Sustainment Command is leading efforts to retrograde equipment from the country as the war winds down.


Fort Bragg special operations soldiers, including part of the 3rd Special Forces Group, are also deployed, as are about 3,000 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division.



Retired military K9s, handlers help lobby Congress to change dogs' retirement rules


WASHINGTON — You want to get something done in Congress, bring a dog.


At least it couldn’t hurt. As she looked into a hearing room packed with reporters, supporters and four canines on Wednesday, Rep. Dina Titus was reminded of a similar lesson she learned in her statehouse days. (Basically, if you want to have your bill passed, just show up with a dog, the Nevada Democrat remembered.)


Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., saw dog power in even more profound ways.


“Dogs are magical creatures, because they can make a rusty, cranky old curmudgeon like Don Young seem almost lovable,” she said. “So, hats off to the dogs.”


Young, the Alaska Republican who pointed out he was “the only dog musher in the whole Congress,” and others were on hand to help efforts by the American Humane Association to change rules under which military dogs move to civilian life.


Robin Ganzert, president and chief executive of the American Humane Association, said that former military dogs are not guaranteed to be retired in America and might not be reunited with their former handlers. Her group wants the Department of Defense to mandate that all military working dogs be retired on U.S. soil so that they are given military transport back from their war zones. And it wants to ensure that the dogs’ former handlers are provided first opportunity to adopt them.


The group also wants dogs that are working for contractors to be given the same benefits as those that are formally part of the military.


Three former handlers of military dogs Ryky, Cila and Thor spoke in halting, emotional ways about the bonds they had with their animals — and how they jumped through major hoops to be reunited with them after their service ended.


The dogs that took over a hearing room of the House Budget Committee had served in Iraq and Afghanistan, sniffing for explosives, helping rescue fallen soldiers, enduring multiple tours. They carry some of the same post-traumatic issues as returning soldiers.


“We had some challenging times in Iraq, but we both made it out safely,” Army veteran Jason Bos said of his companion, Cila, who served with him on almost 100 missions. “Now Cila is a couch potato. She’s retired. She can eat what she wants. She can get fat … just be like a regular retired person.”


While the American Humane Association is rounding up support in Congress, Ganzert said the Department of Defense could handle the changes administratively, without the need for legislation.



DOD to provide space for 5,000 more migrant children until next year


WASHINGTON — The U.S. military will provide housing space for up to an additional 5,000 unaccompanied Central American children who have illegally come across the border, Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren said Wednesday.


Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel signed the authorization last week at the request of the Department of Health and Human Services.


Hagel’s order also extends the housing assistance mission to Jan. 31, 2015. In May, the Pentagon committed to providing space to up to 3,600 children for 120 days. There are 2,500 children being housed at Fort Sill, Okla., Naval Base Ventura County, Calif., and Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, according to Warren.


The Defense Department has not selected the bases where the additional 5,000 might be placed.


“We have not determined where these additional 5,000 spaces will come from. We are conducting assessments now to determine where we can best handle this influx of capacity ... There’s a fairly extensive list of possible locations,” Warren said.


DOD has not yet authorized space to be provided at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash., Warren said. JBLM has been rumored to be a fourth potential housing location that the Pentagon is considering.


DOD is not directly involved in caring for the children. The department is merely providing unused space on military bases to be used by HHS. The Pentagon will be reimbursed by DHHS for any expenses incurred in the housing assistance mission, according to officials.


The Obama administration has said that it intends to repatriate the unaccompanied children to their home countries eventually.


On Capitol Hill Wednesday, House Republicans moved to slash President Barack Obama’s emergency spending request for the U.S.-Mexican border, speed young migrants back home to Central America, and send National Guard troops.


The proposals Wednesday amounted to a rebuke of Obama’s proposed solution to the crisis on the border. They put the House on a collision course with the Democratic-run Senate, and increased the likelihood that congressional efforts to address the crisis on the border, where unaccompanied young people have been showing up by the tens of thousands, will end in stalemate. There is little time to resolve it because Congress’ annual August recess is just around the corner.


More than 57,000 minors have arrived since October, mostly from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala.


A 2008 law guarantees them judicial hearings, which in practice allows them to stay in this country for years — before any deportation can be carried out — because of major backlogs in the immigration court system.


The Associated Press contributed to this report.


harper.jon@stripes.com

Twitter: @JHarperStripes



Germans withholding evidence in AFN murder case pending death penalty decision


KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany — German authorities will withhold key evidence in the strangulation death of an AFN broadcaster — including the victim’s throat — unless the U.S. military gives assurances it will not seek the death penalty for the airman accused of the murder.


The U.S. military charged Staff Sgt. Sean Oliver in March with murder in the death of Petty Officer 2nd Class Dmitry Chepusov. German police stopped Oliver on Dec. 14 in Kaiserslautern for driving erratically and found Chepusov’s lifeless body in the passenger seat of Oliver’s car.


After conducting an autopsy, German authorities concluded that Chepusov, a 31-year-old sailor assigned to the American Forces Network at Ramstein Air Base, died of “force to the neck.”


Although German authorities initially cooperated with U.S. military investigators, they withheld the throat and other evidence when they turned Chepusov’s body over to U.S. authorities.


At issue is the death penalty, which Germany abolished in 1949. Like other countries that have outlawed capital punishment, Germany will not cooperate with any other state in the prosecution of a capital case.


The NATO Status of Forces Agreement gives the U.S. military primary jurisdiction over Oliver since the alleged crime was against another military member, said Juan Melendez, a spokesman for the 86th Airlift Wing at Ramstein.


Before handing over all of the evidence to U.S. investigators, the Germans sought — and initially received — assurances from the Americans that the death penalty was not on the table, according to Achim Nunenmann, senior prosecutor for the city of Kaiserslautern.


Before the handover, however, the Americans told Kaiserslautern prosecutors that Oliver could face execution after all.


That prompted the Germans to hold back some of the physical evidence, Nunenmann said.


Under the law, the Germans must do all they can to refrain from cooperating with the guest military, in this case, the U.S., on anything that would lead to a death sentence, said Dieter Deiseroth, a legal expert on the SOFA and a judge at Germany’s federal administrative court.


Based on the constitution and corresponding case law, German authorities can only cooperate “when we know that it will not come to a death penalty,” said Udo Gehring, lead prosecutor in Kaiserslautern. “This is not a matter of interpretation ... it is a clear point of law.”


Air Force prosecutors would not speculate on how missing evidence might affect the strength of their case against Oliver.


Army Maj. Dori Mitchell Franco, the armed forces regional medical examiner who conducted a second autopsy six days after Chepusov’s death, told an Article 32 hearing Friday that without being able to examine the missing tissue, she could not definitively determine the cause of death, although injuries appeared to be “consistent” with strangulation. The missing portion included the hyoid bone, a small U-shaped bone in the neck that can be fractured during strangulation.


The U.S. military has yet to decide whether to seek a death sentence for Oliver, who is alleged to have murdered Chepusov “with premeditation” by strangling him with his hands, according to Oliver’s charge sheet. The Uniform Code of Military Justice says the death penalty can be applied if the murder was premeditated.


Nunenmann, the Kaiserslautern senior prosecutor, said his office is willing to cooperate – if the U.S. military takes the death penalty off the table.


“If they want the exhibit (physical evidence), they need to do something,” he said.


Investigating officer Air Force Lt. Col. Christopher Leavey, who presided over Oliver’s Article 32, a pretrial hearing, is expected to recommend specific charges against Oliver and whether the death penalty should be sought. The final decision is up to the convening authority, 3rd Air Force commander Maj. Gen. Darryl L. Roberson.


The death penalty is a rare outcome in military trials, especially in the Air Force. No military member has been executed since 1961, when Army Pvt. John Bennett was hanged for raping an 11-year-old Austrian girl seven years earlier and attempting to drown her. Andrew Witt, convicted of killing a fellow airman and his wife at Warner Robins Air Force Base in Georgia in 2004, is the only airman on death row at Fort Leavenworth’s prison.


There are five other servicemembers on death row, all soldiers, all enlisted — except for former Maj. Nidal Hasan, who was sentenced to death for a 2009 rampage that killed 13 people and wounded 30 at Fort Hood, Texas.


Chepusov’s brother, Dennis Bushmitch, 43, said his family opposes the death penalty for Oliver and is asking the German authorities to provide full cooperation.


“We are urging the Americans not to pursue the death penalty,” Bushmitch said.


He and younger brother Andrey Chepusov attended Oliver’s Article 32 hearing at Ramstein Air Base. “We ask the German government to fully cooperate … and release any evidence that they’re still holding back, which is important to the case, because justice needs to be served.”


During the Article 32, Air Force Maj. Shane McCammon, defense counsel for Oliver, noted that Franco, the Army medical examiner, first reported Chepusov’s cause of death as undetermined, only later revising her findings after consulting with fellow medical examiners at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.


“This is an unusual situation, to not have any of that tissue in this area,” Franco said.


McCammon asked whether Franco was able to collect any DNA evidence, either from under the victim’s fingernails or from his neck area. Franco said she was not because the body had been washed before she received it, a week after his death. The victim’s hands were blackened with fingerprint ink.


She said she didn’t know whether the Germans had collected any DNA evidence during their autopsy.


In addition to the victim’s throat, Franco said, the Germans also kept Chepusov’s tongue.


“I’ve been told there were political motivations for retaining” the evidence, Franco testified.


Germany has long been one of the most outspoken critics of the death penalty in Europe, opposing it on ethical, moral and legal grounds.


It outlawed the death penalty after the Nuremberg trials, where the widespread use of the death penalty by Nazi courts within Germany and in occupied territories came to light. Article 102 of Germany’s constitution says simply: “The death penalty is abolished.”


Most European countries have a commitment not to assist human rights violations, including executions, said James Connell III, an attorney at the Pentagon’s Office of the Chief Defense Counsel.


Connell cited the case involving Jens Soering, a German citizen accused of killing two people in Virginia in 1985. Germany fought Soering’s extradition to the United States on the basis that the defendant might be executed if convicted, Connell said. The government of Britain, where Soering had been arrested on check fraud charges, extradited him only after obtaining assurances from Virginia that it would not, in fact, charge him with capital murder.


Stars and Stripes reporter John Vandiver contributed to this report.


svan.jennifer@stripes.com


kloeckner.marcus@stripes.com



Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Do we know anything about Flight MH17?


The downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 highlights a fact long known to those watching the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine: You can’t expect reliable information about it from officials or media, whether Russian, Ukrainian or Western. As a result, relatives of people killed on the plane must now subsist on a familiar diet of rumors and falsehoods — often incredibly callous ones.


On Friday, Anton Geraschenko, an aide to Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, wrote the following on Facebook (original spelling and syntax preserved):


“Just now I have received information that terrorists — death-hunters were collecting not only cash money and jewelry of the crashed Boing died passengers but also the credit cards of the victims. Currently they might as well try to use them in Ukraine or pass them on to Russia. My humble request to the relatives of the victims to freeze their credit cards, so that they won’t loose their assets to terrorists!”


Mainstream Ukrainian media immediately picked up the allegation and spread it as straight news. “The Russian mercenaries are openly looting the crash site of the Malaysian Boeing: taking not just cash and jewelry but credit cards from the dead passengers,” Censor.net reported, quoting Geraschenko only in the next paragraph.


Foreign media picked up the thread. The Wire’s item, headlined “Looters Stole Cash, Credit Cards, and Jewelry from Flight MH17 Crash Victims,” quoted Gerashchenko along with a secondhand account “from a photojournalist at the site” and a story in the New York Daily News. That story, in turn, cited a USA Today story written by a reporter at the site. The USA Today article, the only firsthand report in this chain of insinuation, didn’t claim that bodies had been looted. In fact, it described “credit cards and photographs carefully lined up next to each other on the wet grass.”


The looting story having acquired the contours of a fact, however, the Dutch Banking Union felt compelled to point out that Dutch credit cards, like those in most European countries, cannot be used without a PIN. They are equipped with security chips. In the event someone does manage to use a victim’s card, the Dutch bankers promised to reimburse the victim’s next of kin. As yet, there have been no reports suggesting such compensation is necessary.


Did separatists actually steal victims’ credit cards, cash and jewelry? I don’t know. I am none the wiser for having read numerous news reports on the subject in several languages.


I know nothing for sure about how flight MH17 was brought down. I suspect it was shot down by a surface-to-air missile launched by the pro-Russia rebels who hold the territory where the plane crashed. They previously had shot down a few Ukrainian planes in the vicinity and had bragged about it. Unlike the rebels, Ukraine has no need of anti-aircraft weapons. The rebels have no air force. I have no idea, however, where the missiles might have come from. Ukrainian officials and media insist that they were supplied by Russia. They have published a video of a Buk missile launcher being driven somewhere, which proves nothing at all. The Russian defense ministry, of course, has denied any involvement. Both stories are understandable; neither is trustworthy.


The media exist precisely to inform people in convoluted situations such as this. Yet even the relatively few reporters who have managed to get to the site are unable to get a clear picture of what’s happening. They have no access to anyone with knowledge who doesn’t also have an interest in lying. Ukraine wants Western help in crushing the pro-Russia separatists and in imposing sanctions on Russia for supporting the rebellion. Russia wants to avoid blame and sanctions without giving up on the rebels, who do Russia’s bidding by keeping Ukraine unstable. The rebels themselves see obfuscation as their only chance to avoid condemnation for shooting down the plane.


Though modern conflicts are awash in media attention, what readers and viewers get is often an incomprehensible garble. Failure to ascertain the truth is another real-time tragedy.


Bloomberg View contributor Leonid Bershidsky is a Moscow-based writer.



Air Force launching satellites to spy on other satellites


WASHINGTON — The Air Force is about to put a new advanced satellite into space to spy on other countries’ satellites.


On Wednesday, a Delta IV rocket will launch from Cape Canaveral Air Station, Fla., and place two Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program satellites into orbit. They will be the first GSSAP satellites ever launched.


“This neighborhood watch twosome … will be on the lookout for nefarious capability other nations might try to place in that critical orbital regime,” Gen. William Shelton, the head of Air Force Space Command, told reporters at the Pentagon.


Because of its enhanced maneuvering capabilities, the GSSAP satellite can get the best possible vantage point for collecting images of other satellites, according to Shelton.


He said the imagery capabilities on the new satellites are “a big leap forward” compared with the ones the U.S. has been using to monitor objects circling the earth.


“Today the way we track threats in geosynchronous orbit is by basically points of light, and as we take a picture of the sky and dwell on that part of the sky, [we know] things that are moving are satellites, things that are stationary are stars … Through our points of light and various other means, we make inferences on what a particular [foreign] satellite can do,” Shelton explained.


But the GSSAP “gives us an ability … to look at literal images of objects in geosynchronous orbit … A picture is worth a thousand inferences because we can see literally what that [foreign] satellite looks like, and you can effectively reverse-engineer and understand what the capabilities are … to a much greater extent than you can today,” Shelton said.


The launch comes at a time when China is rapidly improving its space and anti-satellite capabilities. Pentagon planners worry that in a future conflict, Beijing might shoot down or disable American military satellites that are critical for communications, intelligence-gathering, and targeting.


“There are myriad counter-space threats that we are seeing on the near horizon,” Shelton said. “We’re going to have to adjust our spacecraft constellations to survive in a very different environment from what we’ve had in the past,” and we need “much better situational awareness of what’s going on; hence GSSAP.”


Shelton was asked specifically whether he was worried about space-based weapons or electromagnetic pulse weapons being used against U.S. military satellites.


“All of the above,” he replied.


Shelton declined to go into detail about what capabilities the Pentagon is developing to thwart enemy anti-satellite weapons.


harper.jon@stripes.com

Twitter: @JHarperStripes