Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Abe says he will uphold Japan's apology for its wartime aggression


TOKYO — Japan's conservative prime minister said Tuesday his government would uphold Tokyo's official apology for the damage and suffering it inflicted on its neighbors during World War II.


Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's assertion comes amid intense speculation in Tokyo — and, to a lesser extent, in Washington — about how he will mark the 70th anniversary of the end of the war this August.


The premier has made it his mission to return Japan to a more "normal" footing, repeatedly signaling that he believes his country has apologized enough for its wartime actions. He has also indicated that he will seek to revise the American-imposed constitution, which renounced Japan's right to possess the means to wage war, to "match the new era."


Under questioning in the Diet, the country's parliament, Abe said his cabinet "upholds the position of previous cabinets regarding recognition of history as a whole," including the Murayama statement delivered 20 years ago on 50th anniversary of the end of the war.


In that statement, then-prime minister Tomiichi Murayama said that after "following a mistaken national policy" Japan had,"through its colonial rule and aggression, caused tremendous damage and suffering to the people of many countries, particularly to those of Asian nations."


"In the hope that no such mistake be made in the future, I regard, in a spirit of humility, these irrefutable facts of history, and express here once again my feelings of deep remorse and state my heartfelt apology," Murayama said.


Abe said that his 70th anniversary statement will be premised on that, and on a similar statement made on the 60th anniversary by Junichiro Koizumi.


"As for what will be in my statement, it will be self-examination of Japan during the last World War, the steps we have taken to become a peaceful country, what contribution Japan will make to the Asia-Pacific region and the world from now on, and what Japan will be like in the next 80, 90 and 100 years," Abe said Tuesday under questioning from the leader of the main opposition Democratic Party of Japan.


"We will bring together our wisdom to think of what we can disseminate to the world, and include it in the new statement," he said.


However, Abe's position is far from consistent. Just three weeks ago on a local TV show, he said that he wanted to issue a statement that reflected "how the Abe government considers the matter," rather than just using "the wording we have repeated."


In particular, he said he wanted to avoid "bits and pieces of argument over whether the previous wording was used or new wording was added." The words "colonial rule and aggression" are particularly contentious in conservative circles here.


Abe is forming a committee of advisers to work on the statement and consider what role Japan should play in the 21st century world. A speech that the prime minister made in the Australian capital of Canberra last year, in which he expressed remorse but did not offer an apology, is said to be the model for his August statement.


His aides are also keeping officials in Washington apprised of Abe's thinking as they begin drafting the statement, according to people involved in the discussions. Abe will visit Washington at the end of April for a visit with President Barack Obama and is seeking to address the joint houses of Congress, according to local reports.


The grandson of post-war Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi, who was suspected of war crimes but never indicted, Abe clearly thinks that Japan has paid its dues for its wartime aggression. He has indicated more overtly than ever that he wants to revise the post-war constitution, which says that "the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation."


In an earlier parliamentary session Monday, Abe said that amending this pacifist clause in the constitution was one of his ruling Liberal Democratic Party's highest priorities.


"I want to deepen public discussion about the way the constitution should be, to match a new era," he said. "And based on such deepening of discussion, I will firmly and steadily work to revise the constitution."


An ally of the prime minister previously said that he would try to revise the document at the end of next year, if the LDP wins a two-thirds majority in the upper house of the Diet. Together with its junior coalition partner, the pacifist Komeito, the LDP already has a two-thirds majority in the lower house.


If both chambers approve the revision, it would then be put to the public in a referendum. But it is far from certain that the changes would win the majority support needed in a Japan where the populace remains wedded to — and proud of — its 70 years of pacifism.


"Abe's impulse is going to be to move as far and as fast as he can on revision and reinterpretation," said Sheila Smith, a Japan expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. "But how much opportunity is there for Abe to move?"


Polls show that the public remains bitterly opposed to revising the constitution. A survey by NHK, the public broadcaster, taken earlier this month found that only a quarter of respondents thought Japan's "self defense forces" should be allowed to go overseas to rescue Japanese overseas, while a third wanted Tokyo to ban such actions and 36 percent were undecided.


But the recent hostage crisis — in which two Japanese nationals held by the Islamic State were beheaded — has created an opportunity for Abe that did not exist before. The prime minister has said that the crisis showed why Japan's self defense forces needed to be freed of their post-war constraints so that the country had a military that could protect Japanese people abroad.


Political scientists say that Abe's advisors are now testing the waters to see how far the government can exploit the public outrage over the gruesome murder of their compatriots.


Washington Post correspondent Yuki Oda contributed to this report.



New rules on narcotic painkillers cause grief for veterans and the VA


WASHINGTON — New federal rules that make it harder to get narcotic painkillers are taking an unexpected toll on thousands of veterans who depend on these prescription drugs to treat everything from missing limbs to post-traumatic stress.


The restrictions, adopted last summer by the Drug Enforcement Administration to curb a national epidemic of opioid abuse, are for the first time, in effect, forcing veterans to return to the doctor every month to renew their medication, although many were already struggling to get appointments at overburdened VA health facilities. And even if patients can get appointments, the new rules pose an additional hardship for many who live a good distance from the health centers.


While the tighter regulation applies to everyone on opioid painkillers, it's hitting veterans especially hard because so many are being treated for horrific injuries sustained during the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and have become dependent on the VA's beleaguered health-care system for medical care.


The rules come at a time of turmoil for the Department of Veterans Affairs. The agency's widespread problem with patient backlogs burst into view last year with revelations that employees had covered up how long veterans had to wait for care, even for such pressing matters as cancer and suicide prevention.


In dramatically curtailing access to the highly addictive painkillers, the government is trying to roll back what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has termed "the worst drug addiction epidemic in the country's history, killing more people than heroin and crack cocaine." The rules apply to "hydrocodone combination products," such as Vicodin.


More than half a million veterans are now on prescription opioids, according to the VA.


Pain experts at the VA say that in hindsight they have been overmedicating veterans, and doctors at the Pentagon and VA now say that the use of the painkillers contributes to family strife, homelessness and even suicide among veterans. A study by the American Public Health Association in 2011 also showed that the overdose rate among VA patients is nearly double the national average.


But some veterans say they have come to depend on these painkillers to function and now, unable to get a timely renewal of the prescription, are suffering withdrawal symptoms that feel like a panic attack and the flu at the same time.


Craig Schroeder was injured in a makeshift-bomb explosion while serving as a Marine corporal in the "triangle of death," a region south of Baghdad. He suffers from traumatic brain injury, which has affected his hearing, memory and movement, and from pain related to a broken foot and ankle and a herniated disc in his back. He has been on a steady regimen of opioids.


But after the DEA regulations were put in place, he was unable to get an appointment to see his doctor for nearly five months, Schroeder recalled. He stayed in bed at his home in North Carolina much of that time.


"It was a nightmare. I was just in unbearable, terrible pain," he said. "I couldn't even go to the ER because those doctors won't write those scripts."


His wife, Stephanie Schroeder, said getting him a VA appointment turned into a part-time job and her "main mission in life." While part of the problem was a shortage of doctors, she said she also noticed that the VA had become hostile toward patients who asked for painkillers.


"Suddenly, the VA treats people on pain meds like the new lepers," she said. "It feels like they told us for years to take these drugs, didn't offer us any other ideas and now we're suddenly demonized, second-class citizens."


Officials at the Disabled American Veterans (DAV), a veterans service organization, said the VA needs to be more compassionate and help veterans through the changes.


"We're hearing from veterans with life-long disabilities, who never had a problem with addiction issues. They have been on these drugs for decades and then all of sudden it was boom, a total change in attitudes," said Joy Ilem, the group's deputy national legislative director.


Gavin West, a clinical operations chief at the VA, said there has been a systematic effort since the fall to contact veterans to explain the new rules, broader concerns about opioid use and alternative options for treatment. At the same time, he said the agency is working to ensure that veterans get the access to medical care that's required.


"The DEA did a good thing here for opioid safety," he said. But he added, "How do you balance the sensitivity of patients and the new rules when all of a sudden a veteran, who's been treated with this medication for 15 years or 20 years has everything change?"


To help them adjust to the changes, Rollin Gallagher, the VA's national director for pain management, said staff are meeting personally with patients. "There is the real anxiety of being in pain and losing control of that pain. We are aware of the fact that we need to pay attention to this," he said.


The agency recently set up a Choice Card program for veterans, which would allow those facing long wait lists or who live more than 40 miles away from a VA hospital to use private clinic visits. Veterans say the initiative is complicated and confusing. VA officials acknowledged this month that veterans have been using this program at a lower rate than anticipated.


DEA officials declined to comment on the specific challenges that the new rules pose for veterans. Barbara L. Carreno, a DEA spokesperson, said in a statement that everyone, including "practitioners employed by the U.S. Veterans Administration," have to follow the new regulations. The officials said the rules are a response to multiple medical studies that have showed that the opioid overdose rate is higher in the United States than anywhere else.


DEA officials offer some flexibility, allowing doctors to write prescriptions for up to 90 days by post-dating them. But many VA doctors will not do that because of concerns over fraud or fatal overdoses and are telling patients they need to come back every month, medical staff say.


Half of all returning troops suffer chronic pain, according to a study in the June issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. So a new generation of pain doctors are pushing for alternative ways to help veterans cope with chronic pain, from acupuncture to bright light therapy to medical marijuana. As part of a $21.7 million initiative with the National Institutes of Health, the VA is looking for therapies that could substitute for opioids.


"Our hospitals are doing some really exciting things to combat chronic pain and take of our care of veterans. There are VA hospitals that are using alpha-stimulation devices to treat pain and depression," McDonald said. "That's only going to continue and keep getting better. And we are getting there."


In the meantime, however, veterans say they continue to bear the burden of the new restrictions on narcotic painkillers.


A retired staff Army sergeant who served in Iraq, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for medical privacy reasons, can't drive because of shrapnel in his femur and pelvis. So now he has to take the bus nearly two hours for "a one-minute consult" to get his medications. He's been on them for more than nine years and never had an addiction problem, he said.


Mike Davis, a retired Army corporal, said he shattered his left arm from the elbow to the fingertips when he fell off of a Pershing missile during maneuvers in Germany in 1979. Over the years, he has had six surgeries.


After the last one, in 2003, he was prescribed opioids and said he has been on them since. Davis, who now works as a social worker in Illinois, said he feels lucky to have found a combination of painkillers that works for him after years of pain.


"It's just insulting to the veteran to assume they are abusing these drugs," said his wife, Linda Davis, who works as his personal patient advocate. "I'm fully aware that people doctor shop, some docs overprescribe. But I think they need to realize that there's a real difference between addiction and dependence."


But Andrew Kolodny, president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, called the new DEA rules "the single most important change that could happen. The best way to treat any disease, whether it's Ebola or opioid addiction, is to stop creating more people with the disease."


At the same time, he said, the VA needs to do far more to help veterans through the rocky transition.


"Unfortunately, veterans are the victims here," Kolodny said. "The VA created this mess by aggressively jumping onto pills as the solution. But it's not something you can just abruptly stop."



Hagel's parting ethics advice to brass: Do better


WASHINGTON — Senior military officers, such as the Navy admirals censured for their role in a bribery scandal, risk discrediting the military when it needs public support more than ever, according to a memo signed by former Defense secretary Chuck Hagel and obtained by USA TODAY.


The Navy's ongoing "Fat Leonard" scandal involving bribes and prostitutes in exchange for secret information is one example of unethical behavior among senior military leaders that led to Hagel's high-level review of their behavior and the memo he signed Feb. 12.


The memo signed in one of Hagel's last acts on the job warns military brass and senior civilians at the Pentagon that "when senior leaders forfeit this trust through unprofessional, unethical or morally questionable behavior, their actions have an enormously negative effect on the profession."


Hagel's memo avoids specific remedies, suggesting instead general approaches such as emphasizing "senior leader accountability" and the need to keep studying the problem. That likely was done to give his successor, Ashton Carter, who was sworn in Tuesday, flexibility to deal with the issue, said Jerry Hendrix, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security and retired Navy captain.


"His last message out the door was not going to be a prescription," Hendrix said. "He's giving a diagnosis to his successors, advice to Ash Carter."


That diagnosis, while not terminal, isn't great. More than 15 generals and admirals have been disciplined for bad or criminal behavior since 2010. A historian, Hendrix said ethical problems among top leaders are as bad as they've been in the post-World War II era. The pressure to make hugely expensive weapon systems a success has bred scandal, including prison time for an Air Force officer in its effort to build a new refueling tanker.


Current and recent scandals include:



  • The Navy's ongoing investigation of senior sailors who have pleaded guilty or have been charged or under investigation in the so-called "Fat Leonard" affair. It takes its name from Glenn Francis, the owner of a firm that serviced ships in Southeast Asia. Federal prosecutors say, Leonard, a huge man, plied sailors with cash, gifts and prostitutes in exchange for secret information on ship movements and profited from it. Last week, the Navy censured three admirals for taking gifts and lavish meals from Leonard. They are retiring.

  • National Guard and Army recruiting programs hurt by fraud and waste. Last year, hundreds of National Guard soldiers were under criminal investigation for kickback schemes involving bonuses for signing up recruits. Last month, a former Army recruiter reaped nearly $4 million in bonuses by setting up a website that appeared to be an official Army portal. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., called on the Army to investigate.

  • The military still has a major problem with sexual assaults in the ranks despite a 27 percent drop in estimated incidents from 2012. In 2014, the Pentagon estimates there were 19,000 incidents of unwanted sexual contact. Top brass has been part of the problem, including Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, who last year was reprimanded and fined $20,000 after admitting that he committed adultery and mistreated his former mistress who had nicknamed him Papa Panda Sexy Pants. He also pleaded guilty to possessing thousands of pornographic images.

  • The Air Force in recent years has fired or disciplined dozens of airmen involved in cheating on proficiency tests. The service also scolded a two-star general, Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, in its missile program after he went on a drunken binge in Moscow, offending his hosts and embarrassing members of the delegation he led.


Hagel established an office to examine such unethical behavior and named Rear Adm. Margaret Klein to lead it. She'll hold the job for another year. One of her charges, the memo directs, will be to study the cause of ethical "lapses" and to improve training and education.


The scandals stole time that Hagel would have spent on other priorities, and prompted him to launch the effort led by Klein, Hendrix said.


The memo's advice is vintage Hagel, Hendrix said.


"This is a Nebraskan simply telling people to do better," Hendrix said. "He's calling to their better angels. He's old school."



2 soldiers convicted in fuel-selling scam in Afghanistan


36 minutes ago




Two American soldiers in Afghanistan have been convicted on federal charges of bribery and fraud in connection with a scheme to sell fuel on the black market in the eastern part of the country.


Sgt. James Edward Norris, 41, of Fort Irwin, Calif, and Sgt. Seneca Darnell Hampton, 31, of Fort Benning, Ga., pleaded guilty last week to charges of money laundering and conspiring to bribe a public official, the Justice Department said in statement. Both soldiers will be sentenced in May.


While stationed at Forward Operating Base Gardez in eastern Afghanistan, both soldiers allowed Afghan civilians to steal fuel from the base’s reserves on a routine basis, the Justice Department said. Norris and Hampton were given $2,000 a day in exchange for allowing Afghan truckers access to the base’s fuel depots.


The co-conspirators were able to keep the scheme under wraps by blaming Afghanistan’s harsh winter conditions as the cause for the steadily declining fuel reserves, Norris said in a statement to the court.


Federal court officials did not disclose how much cash Norris and Hampton pocketed during the scheme. But the Justice Department statement said that upon return stateside, the soldiers had paid $60,000 in cash for a Cadillac Escalade and a GMC Sierra.


As part of their plea agreements, Norris and Hampton will be required forfeit proceeds from the bribery scheme, forfeit the vehicles, and pay restitution, Justice Department officials say.


The case is one small piece of a larger effort by Washington and Kabul to root out corruption within Afghanistan. A report released in December by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction claimed government corruption remains one of the top threats to the country’s political and economic stability.


munoz.carlo@stripes.com

Twitter: @natseccarlo




Missouri National Guard was not authorized to stop Ferguson violence


JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (Tribune News Service) — For months, critics have questioned why the Missouri National Guard did not respond more quickly as buildings burned along Ferguson’s main business corridors.


But even had guardsmen arrived sooner that night in November, interviews and newly released documents show they would not have had the authority to stop the violence.


The Guard was never meant to engage with protesters, Adjutant General Stephen Danner said on Tuesday. Troops were to stand guard over sites critical to the region, sometimes as invisibly as possible, documents show.


Guardsmen were not authorized to shoot to protect property in Ferguson, make arrests, or even stop people from committing most crimes.


“That was never the plan, to have the Guard in Ferguson,” Danner said. “When you’re dealing with a civil disturbance and a tight-knit group of folks coming at you, you cannot string your soldiers down the street like so many parking meters. That is a danger to them.”


Moreover, the Guard’s late arrival on Nov. 24, after violence swept through Ferguson, wasn’t his call. The Guard was waiting for orders from the Missouri Highway Patrol, Danner said.


And the Highway Patrol’s field operations commander, Maj. Bret Johnson, said he simply couldn’t see how the Guard would help, at that moment, without taking lives.


Gov. Jay Nixon’s office released on Tuesday hundreds of pages of internal Guard memos, emails, troop orders and timelines in response to a months-old St. Louis Post-Dispatch public records request. A joint legislative committee has also requested the records, and plans to investigate Nixon’s decisions in Ferguson.


The documents together show a coordinated effort to prepare for the grand jury ruling regarding Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, who shot and killed 18-year-old Michael Brown on Aug. 9.


Protesters took to the streets for nights after Brown’s death. The police response in those early days drew scathing national and international criticism, often accusing public officials of an over-militarized response that incited violence.


The documents released Tuesday show state officials working to change that image, as well as planning their response to the anticipated grand jury announcement.


In a joint interview on Tuesday at National Guard headquarters, Danner and Johnson explained that the state had studied unrest and military response throughout the nation’s history, and wanted to avoid civilian deaths.


“And we made that decision to choose life over property,” Johnson said. If the Guard had tried to stop the arson and looting on Nov. 24, “the only way to stop that, with the amount of people there, would have been with deadly force. We would have used citizen soldiers against our citizens of the state of Missouri.”


The Guard had warned, in a presentation sent to Nixon’s office in October, that it needed to mobilize and “stage” the National Guard early to “mitigate potential POTUS insurrection act authority use” — to prevent U.S. President Barack Obama from sending troops to Missouri.


In November, St. Louis County asked the Highway Patrol — which was coordinating the National Guard response — to provide troops at the Ferguson Police Department, along West Florissant Avenue, and in the Canfield Green apartments, where Brown was shot.


The patrol agreed to place the Guard at the airport, at shopping malls, at hotels hosting area law enforcement and around the county government buildings in Clayton.


But it wanted troops off the front lines. “Governor’s intent to minimize external public appearance,” the mission plans noted regarding deployment in Clayton. “Will place soldiers inside buildings at doors, stairwells, garages and other points of entry … to support (police) in the event they overrun.”


And state officials wouldn’t put troops in Ferguson.


Sets of mission plans explain that deploying troops in Canfield (where armored Humvees were requested by the county) and at the police station do “not appear to meet Governor’s intent for initial National Guard use.”


The Guard did send troops down South Florissant Road and West Florissant Avenue, the area’s two main business arteries, in the days following the grand jury announcement in late November.


But those locations weren’t even on the mission list in the days before the announcement.


Late on the evening of Nov. 24, St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch announced that the grand jury had decided Wilson should not be prosecuted by his office. A large crowd had already gathered outside the Ferguson Police station. Within minutes, small groups broke off and bolted down West Florissant.


Within hours, police cars were burning along the roadside.


That night, fires gutted about a dozen businesses in the area.


Hundreds of angry residents wrote Nixon that night. Some called for his resignation. Some wrote as they watched buildings burn around them.


“I’m keeping looters from getting in the stores over here and I’m doing it by myself,” Andre Akins, who identified himself as a soldier, wrote early on the morning of the 25th. “I stop somebody from trying to set fires here and kept them from taking any more items out of the stores. I’m doing this on my own free will. SO WHERE ARE THE TROOPS.”


Danner said troops arrived just before 1 a.m.


“I will just say, from the Guard, we deployed as soon as we were called,” Danner said. The Highway Patrol notified the Guard at 11:16 p.m., “and we were on site about an hour and a half later, about 10 minutes to 1,” he said.


Danner wouldn’t say he wanted to send troops earlier. He said the decision was for leaders on the ground and the unified command, which included the highway patrol, county police and the St. Louis Police Department.


And even had they arrived sooner, they could not necessarily have stopped the looting and fires, Danner said. Guardsmen, he said, were the “eyes and ears of the Highway Patrol,” and weren’t authorized to make arrests.


And they could only fire their weapons if they feared imminent death or serious bodily injury to themselves or others, documents show.


In planning for the grand jury announcement, the command staff met with a coalition of protesters, Johnson said. They built a plan to keep police out of riot gear. The protesters contended those tactics had incited violence in August, he said.


“If that was the case and we’re trying to do everything from our part to keep things calm, why would we have military soldiers in areas we knew were going to be active protest areas?” said Johnson, whom Nixon has nominated to become the next patrol superintendent.


And there’s nothing now, Johnson said, that he’d do differently.


———


©2015 St. Louis Post-Dispatch


Visit the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at www.stltoday.com


Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC



Two soldiers convicted in fuel-selling scam in Afghanistan


40 minutes ago




Two American soldiers in Afghanistan have been convicted on federal charges of bribery and fraud in connection with a scheme to sell fuel on the black market in the eastern part of the country.


Sgt. James Edward Norris, 41, of Fort Irwin, Calif, and Sgt. Seneca Darnell Hampton, 31, of Fort Benning, Ga., pleaded guilty last week to charges of money laundering and conspiring to bribe a public official, the Justice Department said in statement. Both soldiers will be sentenced in May.


While stationed at Forward Operating Base Gardez in eastern Afghanistan, both soldiers allowed Afghan civilians to steal fuel from the base’s reserves on a routine basis, the Justice Department said. Norris and Hampton were given $2,000 a day in exchange for allowing Afghan truckers access to the base’s fuel depots.


The co-conspirators were able to keep the scheme under wraps by blaming Afghanistan’s harsh winter conditions as the cause for the steadily declining fuel reserves, Norris said in a statement to the court.


Federal court officials did not disclose how much cash Norris and Hampton pocketed during the scheme. But the Justice Department statement said that upon return stateside, the soldiers had paid $60,000 in cash for a Cadillac Escalade and a GMC Sierra.


As part of their plea agreements, Norris and Hampton will be required forfeit proceeds from the bribery scheme, forfeit the vehicles, and pay restitution, Justice Department officials say.


The case is one small piece of a larger effort by Washington and Kabul to root out corruption within Afghanistan. A report released in December by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction claimed government corruption remains one of the top threats to the country’s political and economic stability.


munoz.carlo@stripes.com

Twitter: @natseccarlo




Missing World War II medal returns home


NAPLES, Fla. — Keith Dalen has only a few remaining items from the grandfather who raised him.


There are the old photographs. There is the flag that covered his grandfather's casket after his death in 1992. And there is the Purple Heart medal that his grandfather, Army Staff Sgt. Raymond "Ramon" Ferrer, earned for his service in World War II.


Dalen isn't sure when the medal first went missing — he suspects it happened when he or his son moved a few years back. But earlier this year, the Purple Heart turned up at a pawnshop in Connecticut, where he is from.


A group that reunites Purple Hearts with veterans' families contacted Dalen's daughter and promised to send the medal down to Dalen's home in Estero. He expects to receive the medal any day now.


"It's just a great organization," Dalen said Tuesday.


From what Dalen can remember, his grandfather was shot in December of 1944 and taken to a POW camp, where he was held for about five months until Germany surrendered. Ferrer wasn't one to volunteer a lot of information about his time in the Army, but he would answer questions if his grandson asked. To Dalen, the medal was a tangible reminder of his service, a family heirloom that can't be replaced.


"Even though he didn't make much of it, to me, it showed me the kind of person he was," Dalen said. "He went to war and prepared to risk his life because he felt it was his responsibility."


Army Capt. Zachariah Fike started the organization that became Purple Hearts Reunited in 2009. Upon his return from a deployment, Fike began collecting antiques as a way to keep himself occupied. He started stumbling across military items and rescuing them, feeling sorry that they had been sold and discarded.


As a Christmas present that year, Fike's mother gave him a Purple Heart she'd purchased at a pawnshop for $100. He became interested in tracking down the medal's recipient, and the search eventually led him to the man's family. Fike returned the medal to them and said for the first time in years, the recipient's siblings reunited to claim it.


"It became something more than just returning the medal — it became reuniting the family," Fike said.


Since then, the group has returned more than 100 medals. Fike has made it somewhat of a mission to purchase Purple Hearts — which he said can go for up to $300 — when he comes across them in shops or on eBay.


"Believe it or not, these medals, especially Purple Hearts, are collected like baseball cards," he said.


Fike believes the medals should be placed with the veteran's family or, if that's not an option, a military museum or city hall in the place where the veteran was from. He doesn't believe most of the medals are sold with the permission of the recipient's family.


"There are some instances where the families just don't care, but we have over 100 examples of that not being the case," he said.


In Dalen's case, his grandfather's medal somehow ended up at a pawnshop in Connecticut that was going out of business. The property owner came across the medal and contacted Fike's group for help. Fike was able to find Dalen's daughter, who lives in Naples, through ancestry.com.


Dalen said he assumed his son had possession of the medal, and his son assumed that he did. They didn't even know it was missing.


Dalen now plans to pass the medal along to his son, so it can be enjoyed by the next generation. He is thrilled to have the Purple Heart back in the family.


"We have to thank them very much," Dalen said. "They do this on a regular basis, but I gotta stress: these people are wonderful."


———


©2015 the Naples Daily News (Naples, Fla.)


Visit the Naples Daily News (Naples, Fla.) at www.naplesnews.com


Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC