Saturday, May 24, 2014

Ramstein rallies to keep title from Patch


RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany – The Ramstein Royals sent the Patch Panthers to a heart-breaking defeat Saturday in the latest act of a rivalry that could arguably be called the best in all of DODDS-Europe sports.


Ramstein topped Patch – its competition in every Division I final since baseball became a sports in 2009 - 2-1 in an electrifying finale that was so perfect, it could have been scripted in Hollywood.


Captain Matt Sharpy got to live the dream of every kid who ever strapped on a baseball glove: bases loaded, bottom of the final inning, two outs and the championship on the line.


Sharpy stepped up to the plate, took a couple of practice swings and calmly cranked a two-run double to left field that won the game for the Royals.


“Best feeling in the world right there,” he said. ““It was awesome, we practice it every day. Coach is like ‘Go out there and win the game,’ and it was like that. We were prepared.”


The Panthers had taken a 1-0 lead off of a Thomas Schweighardt sacrifice RBI, and defended that meager lead with excellent glove work, especially on the part of center fielder Dylan Wagner. They looked to be heading to an upset heading into the bottom of the final inning. The Panthers got two quick outs.


Ramstein put two men on base, then Antonio Ortiz was hit by Panther relief pitcher Garrett Becker. Parker Boyle took the mound in the hope of disrupting the rhythm of the Royal batters.


Sharpy didn’t look disrupted and for his heroics, was named the Division I MVP.


But that honor could just have easily gone to any number of players. Pitcher Jonathan Oswald had six strikeouts on the day, including one with the bases loaded to get out of a jam and keep the score close.


Santee Jackson and Kieffer Allen both put in a solid days work on defense.


Jackson said that team effort is what pushed the Royals over the top.

“It was a hard-fought win,” he added. “We went down by one run, but none of our players got down. None of us. We knew we were coming back. There was no doubt. We knew.”


Like most rivalries, there is a mixture of good-natured animosity and a healthy dose of respect that keeps the competitive fires burning.


Patch head coach Drake Marbury said the Panthers will be back next year to take the title back.


“They kept their composure the whole game and supported each other,” he added. “I’m very proud of them – a fine group of young men.”




Darnell.michael@stripes.com



'Restrepo' documentarian returns with 'Korengal'


LOS ANGELES — Sebastian Junger wants 84 minutes of moviegoers' time, especially civilian moviegoers.


In "Korengal," the filmmaker employs that amount of footage unused in his 2010 Afghanistan war documentary "Restrepo" to paint a psychological portrait of soldiers, not to re-chronicle the conflict cunningly captured in the Oscar-nominated original.


"I really thought of it an inquiry," said Junger, a journalist and author. "'Restrepo' wasn't an inquiry. 'Korengal' is an inquiry into the experience of war and how it affects people. Civilians really need to understand the experience. We sent them out there in the first place, and now we have to bring them back. The more we understand about what they went through, the better."


Junger is optimistic that the new film will have as much of an impact as "Restrepo," which was co-directed by the late documentarian Tim Hetherington and told of the year the two spent embedded with a U.S. platoon in Afghanistan's dangerous Korengal Valley.


(Hetherington was killed by shrapnel from a mortar round while covering fighting in Libya in 2011.)


Junger financed "Korengal" with partners but turned to crowd-funding for distribution of the film, which opens in New York on May 30. He said revisiting the hundreds of hours of footage filmed in 2007 and 2008 with Hetherington was invigorating after working on the biographical HBO film, "Which Way Is the Front Line from Here? The Life and Time of Tim Hetherington."


"I had made a whole film about Tim's life and his death, so I had sort of hacked my way through that emotionally already," said Junger. "There were some poignant moments looking at the footage he shot, but it also felt like I was breathing new life into the footage that he and I shot during that amazing year, so he was living on a little more."


With the influx of soldiers returning home from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Junger hopes the film can act as a bridge to understanding between civilians and veterans. For instance, Junger said a former military spouse recently wrote to him and acknowledged she wouldn't have divorced her veteran husband had she first seen "Restrepo."


"The next big project, which will probably take longer and cost more money, is reintegrating almost 3 million combat veterans from the past two wars back into society," said Junger. "For me, 'Korengal' is the beginning of the process. It's about understanding who these people are coming home and how they've been affected by what they've been through."


Michael Cunningham, a member of the platoon chronicled in "Restrepo" and "Korengal," agreed. Whether it's watching his fellow bored-out-of-their-skulls soldiers play "Guitar Hero," thanks to a generator delivered to their mountainous outpost, or gleefully engaging in a violent firefight with insurgents, Cunningham believes audiences will learn from the film.


"I think people should go see this movie out of respect for themselves, not because of what I did or other soldiers are doing," said Cunningham. "Whether you like it or not, you're an American citizen, this is your country, so you might as well get the best understanding you can from something that I think aptly sums up the experience."



Toy exec and Army vet credited as ‘father of GI Joe’ dies


PROVIDENCE, R.I. — Donald Levine, the Hasbro executive credited as the father of G.I. Joe for developing the world's first action figure, has died. He was 86.


He died of cancer early Thursday at Home & Hospice Care of Rhode Island, said his wife, Nan. They were just about to celebrate their 60th wedding anniversary.


Levine shepherded the toy through design and development as Hasbro's head of research and development. He and his team came up with an 11½-inch articulated figure with 21 moving parts, and since the company's employees included many military veterans, it was decided to outfit the toy in the uniforms of the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force, with such accessories as guns, helmets and vehicles.


Levine, who served in the Army in Korea, said he got the idea for the moveable figure as a way to honor veterans.


G.I. Joe hit the shelves in time for the 1964 Christmas shopping season and soon became a big seller at $4 apiece.


"Don Levine and his team took it from a good concept to a great concept," said Alan Hassenfeld, Hasbro's former CEO whose father, Merrill, oversaw G.I. Joe's development when he ran the company.


G.I. Joe remained popular until the late 1960s, as opposition to Vietnam intensified and parents shied away from military-related toys. Hasbro countered in 1970 by introducing "Adventure Team" G.I. Joes that played down the military connection. Into the '70s, G.I. Joes featured "lifelike hair" and "kung-fu grip" and were outfitted with scuba gear to save the oceans and explorer's clothing for discovering mummies.


Hasbro said in a statement that Levine's "influence on the toy industry was profound" as his team developed the concept of an action figure.


"His work forever changed the way kids play with toys, and in particular helped birth the G.I. Joe brand which has been a part of the American fabric for 50 years," the company said.


Over the decades, G.I. Joe has spawned comic books, cartoons, two movies starring Channing Tatum, and a G.I. Joe Collector's Club and its annual convention — GIJoeCon — held in Dallas in April.


Levine's funeral will be held Sunday morning at Temple Beth-El in Providence. He is survived by his wife, three children and four grandchildren.



Veterans from Vietnam, Korea see off Marines deploying to Afghanistan


CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — Veterans who served in 1st Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company in Vietnam and Korea stood shoulder to shoulder Friday evening to shake the hands of 20 Marines deploying to Afghanistan this Memorial Day weekend.


The elder Marines patted their younger counterparts on the back and told them to keep their heads down as the men boarded a bus to the airport.


The Marines of 1st ANGLICO’s Supporting Arms Liaison Team Charlie are likely the last such unit to deploy to Afghanistan, and may be among the last Marines to come home from the conflict at the end of the year.


Cpl. Jeremy Schacht said he volunteered to extend his contract so he could deploy to Afghanistan with the unit a second time. ANGLICO Marines were among the last American troops to leave Vietnam, he said, and the current ANGLICO Marines recognize that it’s “pretty cool to be closing out another chapter in the book.”


ANGLICO teams typically attach to non-Marine units — including other branches of the U.S. armed services and other nations’ militaries — and serve as liaisons between those units and Marine aviation, artillery and other firing capabilities.


Though the Marines have a general idea of what they’ll be doing once they’re in Afghanistan, they also expect a lot of changes, said Capt. Michael Bezzerides, the officer in charge of SALT-C.


“As the drawdown happens, everyone’s mission is going to be changing,” he said.


Lt. Col. Brian Russell, commander of 1st ANGLICO, is staying at Camp Pendleton this time, but was part of the unit that built Camp Leatherneck in Helmand province in 2009. His Marines will be part of Marine Expeditionary Brigade-Afghanistan, which will close down the base later this year.


“I suspect [the Marines] won’t be as busy as they’d like to be,” but that’s a good thing, Russell said.


Family members and fellow Marines gathered outside the barracks to wish the deploying men well. They snacked on brownies and nachos on the cool, windy evening as children and dogs played nearby.


Staff Sgt. Antonio Henderson’s three-year-old son and eight-year-old daughter began to cry as the bus pulled up to take their father to the airport. Henderson’s wife, Marie, said it is his third or fourth deployment, but it never gets any easier.


“You prepare yourself as much as you can,” she said.


It’s particularly hard when they are living in a state far from family, so they have to rely on the kindness of strangers, she said. Marie is from New York, while Antonio is from South Carolina.


Obdulia Sierra said this is the fourth deployment for her husband, Sgt. Carmelo Sierra, and it has become almost a routine – though that hasn’t kept her from being sad. The couple’s daughter, seven-year-old Juliana, had a particularly rough week after a schoolmate brought up the possibility that her father could be killed overseas.


Obdulia and Carmelo pulled her out of school for a few days and had a big talk with her, Obdulia said, and she was smiling and playing before the bus arrived.


“She’s taking it well right now,” Obdulia said.


After rounds of hugs and tears from Marines and their families, the men shook the hands of those who had gone before and boarded the bus. They drove away past two lines of fellow Marines, who sent them off with a salute.


hlad.jennifer@stripes.com


Twitter: @jhlad



Okinawa mayor invokes red tape, manatee deaths to stop US base


WASHINGTON — Susumu Inamine, the mayor of Nago on Okinawa island, acknowledges he's failed so far to persuade the Japanese and U.S. governments to drop plans to move an American military base to ecologically sensitive land in his city.


But he's not giving up.


Inamine Tuesday questioned the effectiveness of the U.S. military force on Okinawa and vowed to use his mayoral authority to block permits for the new base. He also promised to press his case with the global community and environmentalists about the threat the facility would pose to the biodiversity of Nago's Henoko area, including to endangered sea cows also known as manatees.


"Why should only Okinawa hold the burden for security of all of Japan, when the presence of U.S. Marines doesn't play a big role in deterring China?" Inamine, 68, said in an interview in Washington. "I, as mayor, have operational control over two ports that are needed for use as construction landfill and I will exercise all powers in the municipality to block access."


The American military presence on Okinawa remains among the most contentious issues in relations between the U.S. and Japan. Over the years, U.S. officials have apologized for crimes committed by servicemen and faced anger over noise, pollution and accidents tied to the bases.


Outrage over the 1995 rape of a 12-year-old girl by three U.S. servicemen led to an agreement the following year to try to reduce the burden on the island by shifting Marine Corps Air Station Futenma out of the city to a site to be built partly on reclaimed land in the more rural Henoko region. The plan was re- endorsed a decade later.


Okinawa, Japan's southern-most archipelago, makes up less than 1 percent of the country's land area and hosts about half the 38,000 U.S. military personnel stationed in Japan. It's regarded as strategically important by the U.S. because it's close to Southeast Asia and Taiwan.


Japan has been seeking to strengthen its military ties with the U.S. at a time when it is embroiled in a territorial dispute with China. On April 24, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Obama "affirmed the resolve on both sides" to make "steady progress" on the relocation of the Futenma Air Station.


"Okinawa Governor Nakaima has requested termination of the operation of the Futenma Air Station in five years or less," Abe said during the U.S. leader's visit to Tokyo. "With regard to this and other requests by the governor, I explained this" to Obama "and requested further cooperation from the United States to alleviate the impact on Okinawa."


Inamine, who was visiting New York and Washington this week, said he wasn't able to persuade the U.S. government officials and members of Congress he met to scrap plans for the facility at Henoko.


As part of his effort to rally opposition to the base, he sat down with representatives from the Marine Mammal Conservancy on May 19. He said he hopes to engage U.S. environmentalists on threats the new base would pose to Henoko's unspoiled coastline and to creatures such as the dugong, a relative of the sea cow.


With Abe's Liberal Democratic Party holding a strong majority in the Diet, the prime minister can easily alter the law to bypass Inamine if needed. Inamine said he recognizes the possibility of such legal changes, though he added that such a move would have serious implications for the Japanese democracy.


"A majority if not all of the residents don't want the base in our city and what does it mean for both the U.S. and Japan to ignore citizens' voices?" Inamine said.


A poll published by regional broadcaster Ryukyu Asahi on Dec. 3 found three-quarters of the 1,076 respondents said Futenma, now located in the city of Ginowan, should be moved outside the prefecture or outside the country. About 72 percent said the governor shouldn't approve the land reclamation project to build the new base. The survey was carried out between Nov. 28 and Dec. 2 and gave no margin of error.


Reported with assistance from Isabel Reynolds in Tokyo.



Friday, May 23, 2014

Japanese-American soldier kept quiet about World War II heroics


Fifty years is a long time to keep a secret. But that’s what Roy Matsumoto was instructed to do, so that’s what he did.


For decades, he seldom said anything about World War II at all, said his daughter, Karen Matsumoto, of Bainbridge Island.


He didn’t talk about his time in “Merrill’s Marauders,” a U.S. Army unit that worked behind enemy lines in Burma in a high-risk campaign that suffered heavy casualties.


He didn’t talk about how he was credited with saving hundreds of his fellow American soldiers with actions as bold and resourceful as barking out orders in Japanese to mislead Japanese soldiers.


Nor did he talk about the hand grenade he had carried, which he intended to use on himself if captured, to make sure enemy forces couldn’t torture him into giving out information that could jeopardize not just his American comrades but his relatives still living in Japan.


And he certainly didn’t talk about the information he was instructed to keep secret, his work with the U.S. Military Intelligence Service, which included assisting with the interrogation of Japanese prisoners after the war.


“Sometimes, I would think, ‘Could I really be his daughter?’ I can’t keep a secret for more than a couple of days,” said Karen Matsumoto, 60, who teaches at a Suquamish tribal school.


On April 21, less than two weeks shy of his 101st birthday, Roy Matsumoto, a much-decorated master sergeant and linguistic specialist, died in his sleep at his San Juan Island home.


Although his voice has been stilled, it also has been preserved, thanks to a collaboration between Karen Matsumoto and Bainbridge Island documentary producers Lucy Ostrander and Don Sellers.


Their 28-minute video, “Honor & Sacrifice: The Roy Matsumoto Story,” airs at 7 p.m. Sunday on KCTS Channel 9, an expanded version of a 17-minute video first released several years ago.


“Roy’s story was too fantastic to believe,” Sellers said. “You couldn’t make it up ... and yet it was all true.”


He and Ostrander have worked with Karen Matsumoto to record a number of oral histories from Bainbridge Island’s Japanese-American residents.


Roy Matsumoto’s story is unique, but it sheds light on the difficulties faced by 120,000 American residents of Japanese descent who were forced out of their West Coast homes and held in relocation camps during World War II under an order from President Franklin D. Roosevelt.


At the start of the war, Matsumoto was living in Southern California, delivering groceries, and many of his customers were Japanese immigrant families. After Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, Matsumoto was among some 16,000 men, women and children taken to a camp in Jerome, Ark.


Some in the camps were told they could get out if they went into the U.S. military, and many fought valiantly to protect the country that had imprisoned them.


Matsumoto’s personal history made him a significant asset to the U.S. Army. He was born in the U.S. but lived part of his youth in Japan, and attended schools in both countries.


He was among a dozen men of Japanese background to join a 3,000-man volunteer unit under Brig. Gen. Frank D. Merrill to work behind enemy lines to disrupt Japanese supply and communication lines. The unit would be cut off from other Allied forces and a high casualty rate was expected.


In the video, Matsumoto tells of finding a wire strung in a tree. “We just got there so it couldn’t be ours,” he said. He climbed the tree and used a telephone handset to tap into the line, discovering it was used by Japanese combat units. From the conversation, he was able to learn the location of a Japanese ammunition dump that his battalion then found and destroyed.


In the jungle and rugged terrain, with dwindling supplies, Matsumoto and his fellow soldiers were exhausted, hungry, weak.


“Eventually, we were going to be wiped out. That’s what we thought,” he said.


One night, after creeping close to a Japanese camp, he overheard soldiers discussing a plan to attack his battalion at dawn. He alerted his superiors, who had the unit move to a higher, more defensible position from which they turned back the Japanese assault.


Karen Matsumoto said the dialect in which Japanese soldiers had been discussing their plans was one that her father had heard years earlier while delivering groceries to Japanese immigrants in Los Angeles.


After the war, Roy Matsumoto remained in the Army until 1963, and later worked for the U.S. Postal Service, and as a handyman. He is survived by his wife of 67 years, Kimiko, another daughter, Fumi Matsumoto of Juneau, Alaska, and three grandchildren.


Karen Matsumoto, who narrates the video, said she knew little of her father’s war service until she was 30 and in graduate school. That’s when someone told her about a fictionalized account of Merrill’s Marauders that included a character called Matsumoto.


Following up, she found a number of references to her father in historic accounts of his Merrill’s Marauders.


She learned that of the original 3,000 members of the marauders, only about 200 survived the five-month mission.


Getting her father to talk about it was a gradual process, and he continued to keep his silence about his military-intelligence work.


Among the many honors and commendations bestowed on her father are the Legion of Merit, the Congressional Gold Medal and inductions into both the U.S. Army Ranger Hall of Fame and the Military Intelligence Corps Hall of Fame.


A memorial potluck in his honor is set for noon Monday at the Brickworks in Friday Harbor.


Friday Harbor also is hosting its annual Memorial Day Parade on Spring Street at 10 a.m., one of many Memorial Day events around Western Washington.


Karen Matsumoto admires her father’s military service and his devotion to the U.S., even though, over the years, their politics didn’t mesh — he was conservative and she, a liberal.


“We were like this sometimes,” she said, knocking her fists together.


Among those who have confirmed her father’s accomplishments is Robert Passanisi, a historian for the Merrill’s Marauders Association.


“Roy Matsumoto’s service with Merrill’s Marauders was the one thing that spelled the difference between success and failure,” he said in an obituary on Matsumoto published in Military Times. “Every marauder knows that if it wasn’t for Ranger Roy Matsumoto, fewer, if any, marauders would have returned from North Burma.”



Russia threatens to counter NATO buildup on borders as ties fray


MOSCOW — Russia will take measures against a buildup of NATO forces on its borders as regional and global security weakens with the rupture of ties between the former Cold War enemies, the country's top military commander said Friday.


The Ukrainian conflict is "practically a civil war" as the authorities in Kiev are using the army against "unarmed civilians," Valery Gerasimov, the head of the Russian military's General Staff, told a security conference in Moscow. Internal conflicts "are no longer purely domestic and take on an increasingly international character."


The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has added air and naval patrols and reinforced land troops in Poland, Romania and its Baltic member states to increase deterrence following Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, which holds a presidential election this weekend. The Baltic nations are seeking permanent stationing of NATO troops and bases to counter what they say is Russia's own military buildup in the region.


As NATO began to strengthen defenses in recent weeks, Russia accused it of violating a 1997 pledge to limit its military profile in eastern Europe. The U.S.-led military alliance responded that it was compelled by Russia's territorial appetite to take defensive steps. The 1997 accord tied NATO's force posture to "the current and foreseeable security environment," something altered by Russia's military buildup.


"The operational and combat readiness of the alliance's forces is intensifying on Russia's borders," Gerasimov said. "In these conditions, we can't stay on the sidelines of what is happening. We will have to take measures in response."


NATO says Russia has deployed 40,000 troops on the Ukrainian border. President Vladimir Putin this week ordered a withdrawal of Russia's forces from the frontier, telling soldiers in the Rostov, Belgorod and Bryansk regions to return to their permanent stations and be back at their bases by June 1 after completing exercises.


Gerasimov, who's also a first deputy defense minister, was among people added by the European Union to its list of those sanctioned to protest Russia's actions in Ukraine. The general is "responsible for the massive deployment of Russian troops along the border with Ukraine and lack of de-escalation of the situation," the EU said.


Russia's staredown with NATO is intensifying across the region. Russia more than tripled the size of its military helicopter unit near Latvia, increasing the number of choppers to about 100 in the course of the Ukrainian crisis, Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics said April 25. Helicopters stationed at the Ostrov air base can reach the Baltic state's capital, Riga, in about an hour.


Poland, which already spends more than average for NATO's European members on defense, plans to sign a deal to buy 70 long-range tactical transport helicopters and take a share in a missile-defense partnership.


Latvia ramped up spending by almost 12 percent last year while its northern neighbor Estonia, also bordering Russia, spent a greater share of its national output on defense than France in 2013 for the second year running, NATO figures show.


NATO's European members have spent an average of 1.6 percent of economic output annually on defense since 2011. Only four of the bloc's 28 members met its target level of 2 percent last year.


Russia "regards the NATO frontline states in the Baltic Sea region and possibly in the Black Sea region as a sort of soft underbelly of the alliance," Estonian Defense Minister Sven Mikser said in a May 6 interview. He called for a "stronger NATO footprint on the soil of the frontline states."


Ukrainian government forces suffered their worst losses yesterday in battles with pro-Russian separatists since the secession campaign began in March. An attack by rebels near Volnovakha, about 50 kilometers (31 miles) south of Donetsk, left 16 servicemen dead, First Deputy Health Minister Ruslan Salyutin said in televised remarks. One soldier was killed and two injured in the Luhansk region, the Defense Ministry said.


Ukraine is pinning its hopes on the May 25 election producing an undisputed successor to Viktor Yanukovych, the Russian-backed president who was toppled in February.


Ummelas reported from Tallinn. Leon Mangasarian contributed from Berlin.



Thursday, May 22, 2014

Report: Army reprimanded ex-Delta Force commander over 2008 book


WASHINGTON — When retired Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin, the former commander of the U.S. Army's elite and secretive Delta Force, published a book in 2008, it detailed some of the Pentagon's most sensitive operations of the 20th century. Among them were the 1979 hostage crisis in Iran and the tragically flawed 1993 mission in Somalia that killed 18 U.S. troops and was later depicted in the book and movie "Black Hawk Down."


Retired military personnel who write about such sensitive issues commonly submit their works to the Pentagon for advance review to ensure that they don't divulge classified information. But Boykin declined to do so, forging ahead with publication of "Never Surrender: A Soldier's Journey to the Crossroads of Faith and Freedom."


The Army struck back last year, quietly issuing him a scathing reprimand following a criminal investigation that concluded he had wrongfully released classified information, according to an Army document obtained by The Washington Post through a Freedom of Information Act request.


According to the Jan. 23, 2013, memorandum, the Army determined that Boykin's book disclosed "classified information concerning cover methods, counterterrorism/counter-proliferation operations, operational deployments, infiltration methods, pictures, and tactics, techniques and procedures that may compromise ongoing operations."


The reprimand is the latest in a series of embarrassing incidents in which senior military officers have faced scrutiny for alleged wrongdoing.


But Boykin says it's not so simple in his case. The Defense Department first launched an investigation into his book shortly after it was published and determined in 2010 that he had not released any classified information, he said. The Army then reopened the investigation about two years later, after he publicly voiced objections to several Pentagon policies, including the ongoing integration of women into more jobs in the military, he said.


The general, who retired in 2007, has a history of making controversial statements in which he has depicted U.S. military operations against Islamic extremist organizations such as al-Qaida as a Christian fight against Satan, riling religious rights groups and organizations dedicated to the separation of church and state.


Asked why he was reprimanded, Boykin questioned the Army's motivation, insisting that he had received approval to write his book before it was released and that all information in it had been disclosed previously in other books, movies and news reports.


"You draw your own conclusions," Boykin told The Washington Post. "Why would they reopen it? What was the purpose of reprimanding me basically five years after they started an investigation? Did it take that long to determine whether I had written anything classified?"


A spokesman for the Army, George Wright, declined to comment on Boykin's comments or to explain why the service waited so long to issue a reprimand for a book published in 2008. "The memo obtained through the Freedom of Information Act speaks for itself," Wright said of the allegations against Boykin.


The memo, signed by Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, then the Army's vice chief of staff, does not specify which information in the book was considered classified. Instead, it cites the disclosure of such information and accuses Boykin of "unprofessional behavior" that "reflects poorly on your character." Austin, one of the most powerful generals in the military, says in the memo that Boykin would not face criminal punishment but that the reprimand was meant to underscore the seriousness of releasing classified information.


"Your decision to disregard legal advice and allow 'Never Surrender'...to be published without seeking classification review reflects a gross lack of judgement," Austin told Boykin, now executive vice president of the Family Research Council in Washington, a conservative Christian organization that lobbies for traditional family values.


Controversy around Boykin's book has arisen before. Shortly after publication, a 2008 Army Times article suggested that Boykin had been named "persona non grata" in Delta Force. Adm. William McRaven, then a three-star officer overseeing Joint Special Operations Command, told lower-ranking commanders to avoid Boykin, the report said. McRaven is now the top officer overseeing U.S. special operations. His spokesman, Ken McGraw, told The Washington Post there is no official "persona non grata" list, but he acknowledged that some individuals working in special operations may have had issues with Boykin's book.


"People sign nondisclosure agreements, and the expectation is that people will live by them," McGraw said.


Boykin told The Washington Post that if he "realized there would be this many accusations hurled against me," he probably would have submitted "Never Surrender" for a Pentagon review. He didn't fight the reprimand because he was retired, he said.


"Any reprimand has to be taken seriously, so I don't want to come across as flippant about it," he said. "But at this stage in my life, it really hasn't had any impact on my life like it would have if it had happened when I was on active duty."


Craig Whitlock contributed to this report.



Marine's sex-assault conviction overturned after ruling on commandant's talk


WASHINGTON — The Marine Corps commandant’s uncompromising talk against sexual assault looked like unlawful command influence, a military appeals court said Thursday, as it overturned a Parris Island enlisted man’s conviction on sexual assault charges.


The high-profile ruling by the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals frees former Staff Sgt. Steve Howell. The ruling also casts stark light on the unforeseen consequences that have ensued from high-level Pentagon and congressional attention to the problem of sexual assault in the military.


“We’re ecstatic,” Howell’s attorney, C. Edward Massey, said in an interview Thursday. “I think this was the right thing to do.”



The decision by the three-judge appellate panel is the latest, and in some ways most dramatic, fallout from a series of remarks given in 2012 by the commandant, Gen. James Amos. Pressed by Congress, Amos delivered a round of talks in which he urged tough action against sexual assault in the ranks.


Amos declared, among other things, that “the fact of the matter is, 80 percent of (allegations) are legitimate sexual assault” rather than “buyer’s remorse.” Amos further pronounced himself “very, very disappointed” in court-martial panels that have become “so soft” and were unwilling to “get rid” of bad apples.


“A disinterested observer, knowing that potential court-martial members heard this very personal appeal in April from the (commandant) to ‘fix’ the sexual assault problem, would harbor significant doubts about the fairness of a sexual assault trial held shortly thereafter in June,” Chief Judge Moira Modzelewski, a Navy captain, wrote for the court.


A concurring judge, Lt. Col. R. Quincy Ward, noted, however, that the court was only finding the appearance of unlawful command influence, rather than actual command influence.


Howell had been charged with rape, forcible sodomy, assault and adultery. He maintained that any sexual contact, with the mother of a potential recruit, was consensual. This was effectively the buyer’s remorse defense that Amos had explicitly dismissed as invalid; or, as the Marine general put it, “bull — — .”


Howell’s 2012 court-martial trial at Parris Island, S.C., became further complicated when the original trial judge, Lt. Col. Robert G. Palmer, delivered his own denunciations of alleged perpetrators while speaking in June 2012 to younger lawyers.


“Palmer made the following comments: ‘The defendant is guilty. We wouldn’t be at this stage if he wasn’t guilty. It is your job to prove he is guilty. You need to take him down,’” Modzelewski recounted.


Palmer’s exhortations came after he had rejected defense requests to find the commandant’s remarks amounted to the appearance of unlawful command influence.


Defense attorneys subsequently complained, and Palmer stepped down from the bench for another assignment. Most recently, the Marine Corps has assigned him to serve as the regional defense counsel for the East Coast, covering bases in North Carolina and South Carolina.


Palmer is slated to start this new job by the end of May. A Marine Corps spokesman said he is unavailable to comment.


Other judges completed Howell’s trial, at which he was eventually found guilty of all charges and sentenced to 18 years in prison. Although these judges took steps to address defense complaints about unlawful command influence, the appellate court reasoned they weren’t sufficient.


“An objective member of the public would be left with the appearance and the impression that Lt. Col. Palmer’s flawed rulings, both on the (unlawful command influence) motion and on defense challenges, infected the verdict and sentence,” Modzelewski concluded.


Massey, who is based in Erlanger, Ky., said Howell will be released from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Leavenworth. Howell has been incarcerated at the military prison in Kansas for the past 1 1/2 years. He also will be restored to his rank of staff sergeant, Massey said.


Potentially, the Marine Corps could decide to put Howell on trial again, as the appellate court reasoned that “allowing a retrial does not unfairly advantage the government.” A decision to seek another trial, or perhaps negotiate severance from the service, was not immediately forthcoming.


“The Marine Corps respects all decisions of the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals and retains full confidence in its military justice system,” Marine Capt. Ty Balzer said late Thursday afternoon.



Veterans to Obama: What took you so long?


When President Barack Obama spoke Wednesday about the growing scandals at the Department of Veterans Affairs, some veterans asked why it took so long for their commander in chief to speak up.


Darrell Richardson attended a town hall meeting in Phoenix last week to tell fellow veterans about the death of his brother, Dennis. Since then, Richardson has been speaking out about the problems with the VA, and asking why Obama and others had not commented or taken action.


“We just feel abandoned,” he said.


Dennis Richardson had been diagnosed with liver cancer at a civilian hospital in July 2012, but when he tried to get an appointment at the Phoenix VA, he was told he would have to wait seven months, his brother said.


A few months later, Dennis’ pain was so severe that he went to the VA’s emergency room for help. He was started on chemotherapy, but stopped the treatments after a few weeks because he was so sick, Darrell said. He died Nov. 8, 2012.


At this point, Richardson said, the president and the VA should be finding veterans who have life-threatening illnesses that require immediate appointments, and getting them in front of doctors.


“Let’s find out who needs care right now, and get them in for an appointment. If the president would have said that [Wednesday] morning, I would have been absolutely ecstatic,” he said.


After a closed-door meeting Wednesday with VA Secretary Eric Shinseki and Deputy Chief of Staff Rob Nabors, whom Obama had already tasked with helping sort out the VA, Obama said that the inspector general has launched investigations into the Phoenix VA and other VA facilities, and that anyone found to have manipulated records will be punished.


Nabors will meet with the heads of veterans service organizations in Phoenix on Thursday.


Gene Crego, Arizona state council president for Vietnam Veterans of America, said he was satisfied with Obama’s statement, though “it took longer than what we were hoping for.”


Crego said he agrees that there are many dedicated people in the VA system, but also knows the long delays in getting an appointment is “something that’s been happening for years,” in part because there is not enough staff.


Obama said his administration has made progress by boosting funding, making VA benefits available to more veterans, and “launching an all-out war on the disability claims backlog.”


But Paul Rieckhoff, CEO of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said the president’s “long-overdue” remarks “were a tremendous disappointment” and “did nothing to quell the growing nationwide VA controversy.”


The American Legion and several members of Congress have called for Shinseki to resign because of the allegations, but Obama on Wednesday called Shinseki “a great soldier.”


“Nobody cares more about our veterans than Ric Shinseki,” Obama said. “He has put his heart and soul into this thing and he has taken it very seriously ... At this stage, [Shinseki] is committed to solving the problem and working with us to do it.”


Richardson and Crego said they think keeping Shinseki in place, at least for now, is the best decision.


“It makes no sense to get rid of him,” Richardson said. “At least he’s committed to helping the vets. He just needs the tools and the authority to do it.”


But American Legion National Commander Daniel Dellinger said the decision to keep Shinseki is “an unfortunate one.”


“The VA,” Dellinger said, “has been aware for some time that inappropriate scheduling procedures are widespread among its medical facilities. Yet Secretary Shinseki has taken no initiative in correcting the problem. Veterans continue to die waiting for their health care, senior VA executives continue to get their bonuses, and only after all of this is the secretary now pledging to fix what’s wrong.”


A 2010 VA memo obtained by the American Legion shows that officials were aware of “gaming strategies” to meet performance measures.


Dr. Samuel Foote, one of the whistleblowers in the Phoenix VA case, first wrote a letter to the inspector general alleging secret waiting lists in late October 2013.


Foote, who retired from the VA in 2013 after more than 23 years, told Stars and Stripes he had known about the waiting lists earlier that year, after a clerk told him they weren’t allowed to make new patient appointments, but he didn’t know until late August that some patients on the list had died while waiting for an appointment.


In the meantime, he said, Sharon Helman, the director of the Phoenix VA Health Care System, received a $9,345 bonus in 2013 for reducing the time it took for patients to get return and follow-up appointments from almost a year to an average of two weeks, even though 13,000 patients were still without primary care providers, Foote said.


“What’s the return wait time when you don’t have a provider?” he said. “It’s infinity … not something to be proud of.”


Teams that met the “wildly important goals” set out by Helman — who has since been put on administrative leave — were rewarded with pizza, Foote said.


“We all celebrated, though later we found out we were celebrating the deaths of several people,” he said.


A July 2012 email exchange reported by the Arizona Republic shows that Helman and other officials were aware then that the data was misleading.


Damian Reese, a program analyst, had written, “I think it’s unfair to call any of this a success when veterans are waiting six weeks on an electronic waiting list before they’re called to schedule their first [primary care] appointment, Sure, when their appointment was created, [it] can be 14 days out, but we’re making them wait 6-20 weeks to create that appointment. That is unethical and a disservice to our veterans,” according to the Arizona Republic.


Records obtained by Fox News show that more than $843,000 in bonuses was awarded to about half the system’s 3,170 workers from 2011 to 2013, and that the hospital spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on gardening and interior design while patients in the emergency room waited hours for care.


Dellinger said that now, veterans are again being told to wait for things to get better.


“Words are nice, and even somewhat comforting,” he said, “but when will the VA’s house be cleansed of those who are soiling it and dishonoring the system?”


hlad.jennifer@stripes.com

Twitter: @jhlad



Veterans to Obama: What took you so long?


When President Barack Obama spoke Wednesday about the growing scandals at the Department of Veterans Affairs, some veterans asked why it took so long for their commander in chief to speak up.


Darrell Richardson attended a town hall meeting in Phoenix last week to tell fellow veterans about the death of his brother, Dennis. Since then, Richardson has been speaking out about the problems with the VA, and asking why Obama and others had not commented or taken action.


“We just feel abandoned,” he said.


Dennis Richardson had been diagnosed with liver cancer at a civilian hospital in July 2012, but when he tried to get an appointment at the Phoenix VA, he was told he would have to wait seven months, his brother said.


A few months later, Dennis’ pain was so severe that he went to the VA’s emergency room for help. He was started on chemotherapy, but stopped the treatments after a few weeks because he was so sick, Darrell said. He died Nov. 8, 2012.


At this point, Richardson said, the president and the VA should be finding veterans who have life-threatening illnesses that require immediate appointments, and getting them in front of doctors.


“Let’s find out who needs care right now, and get them in for an appointment. If the president would have said that [Wednesday] morning, I would have been absolutely ecstatic,” he said.


After a closed-door meeting Wednesday with VA Secretary Eric Shinseki and Deputy Chief of Staff Rob Nabors, whom Obama had already tasked with helping sort out the VA, Obama said that the inspector general has launched investigations into the Phoenix VA and other VA facilities, and that anyone found to have manipulated records will be punished.


Nabors will meet with the heads of veterans service organizations in Phoenix on Thursday.


Gene Crego, Arizona state council president for Vietnam Veterans of America, said he was satisfied with Obama’s statement, though “it took longer than what we were hoping for.”


Crego said he agrees that there are many dedicated people in the VA system, but also knows the long delays in getting an appointment is “something that’s been happening for years,” in part because there is not enough staff.


Obama said his administration has made progress by boosting funding, making VA benefits available to more veterans, and “launching an all-out war on the disability claims backlog.”


But Paul Rieckhoff, CEO of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said the president’s “long-overdue” remarks “were a tremendous disappointment” and “did nothing to quell the growing nationwide VA controversy.”


The American Legion and several members of Congress have called for Shinseki to resign because of the allegations, but Obama on Wednesday called Shinseki “a great soldier.”


“Nobody cares more about our veterans than Ric Shinseki,” Obama said. “He has put his heart and soul into this thing and he has taken it very seriously ... At this stage, [Shinseki] is committed to solving the problem and working with us to do it.”


Richardson and Crego said they think keeping Shinseki in place, at least for now, is the best decision.


“It makes no sense to get rid of him,” Richardson said. “At least he’s committed to helping the vets. He just needs the tools and the authority to do it.”


But American Legion National Commander Daniel Dellinger said the decision to keep Shinseki is “an unfortunate one.”


“The VA,” Dellinger said, “has been aware for some time that inappropriate scheduling procedures are widespread among its medical facilities. Yet Secretary Shinseki has taken no initiative in correcting the problem. Veterans continue to die waiting for their health care, senior VA executives continue to get their bonuses, and only after all of this is the secretary now pledging to fix what’s wrong.”


A 2010 VA memo obtained by the American Legion shows that officials were aware of “gaming strategies” to meet performance measures.


Dr. Samuel Foote, one of the whistleblowers in the Phoenix VA case, first wrote a letter to the inspector general alleging secret waiting lists in late October 2013.


Foote, who retired from the VA in 2013 after more than 23 years, told Stars and Stripes he had known about the waiting lists earlier that year, after a clerk told him they weren’t allowed to make new patient appointments, but he didn’t know until late August that some patients on the list had died while waiting for an appointment.


In the meantime, he said, Sharon Helman, the director of the Phoenix VA Health Care System, received a $9,345 bonus in 2013 for reducing the time it took for patients to get return and follow-up appointments from almost a year to an average of two weeks, even though 13,000 patients were still without primary care providers, Foote said.


“What’s the return wait time when you don’t have a provider?” he said. “It’s infinity … not something to be proud of.”


Teams that met the “wildly important goals” set out by Helman — who has since been put on administrative leave — were rewarded with pizza, Foote said.


“We all celebrated, though later we found out we were celebrating the deaths of several people,” he said.


A July 2012 email exchange reported by the Arizona Republic shows that Helman and other officials were aware then that the data was misleading.


Damian Reese, a program analyst, had written, “I think it’s unfair to call any of this a success when veterans are waiting six weeks on an electronic waiting list before they’re called to schedule their first [primary care] appointment, Sure, when their appointment was created, [it] can be 14 days out, but we’re making them wait 6-20 weeks to create that appointment. That is unethical and a disservice to our veterans,” according to the Arizona Republic.


Records obtained by Fox News show that more than $843,000 in bonuses was awarded to about half the system’s 3,170 workers from 2011 to 2013, and that the hospital spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on gardening and interior design while patients in the emergency room waited hours for care.


Dellinger said that now, veterans are again being told to wait for things to get better.


“Words are nice, and even somewhat comforting,” he said, “but when will the VA’s house be cleansed of those who are soiling it and dishonoring the system?”


hlad.jennifer@stripes.com

Twitter: @jhlad



Air Force nuke security failed test


WASHINGTON — Armed security forces at a nuclear missile base failed a drill last summer that simulated the hostile takeover of a missile launch silo because they were unable to speedily regain control of the captured nuclear weapon, according to an internal Air Force review obtained by The Associated Press.


The previously unreported failure, which the Air Force called a "critical deficiency," was the reason the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana flunked its broader safety and security inspection.


The security team was required to respond to the simulated capture of a Minuteman 3 nuclear missile silo, termed an "Empty Quiver" scenario in which a nuclear weapon is lost, stolen or seized. Each of the Air Force's 450 Minuteman 3 silos contains one missile armed with a nuclear warhead and ready for launch on orders from the president.


The review obtained by the AP through a Freedom of Information Act request sought to examine why the security force showed an "inability to effectively respond to a recapture scenario." It cited their failure to take "all lawful actions necessary to immediately regain control of nuclear weapons" but did not specify those actions.


The prize for terrorists or others who might seek to seize control of a missile would be the nuclear warhead attached to it. In 2009, the Air Force cited a "post-9/11 shift in thinking" about such situations, saying that while this nightmare scenario once was considered an impossibility, the U.S. "no longer has the luxury of assuming what is and what is not possible."


The inspection failure was one of a string of nuclear missile corps setbacks revealed by the AP over the past year. The force has suffered embarrassing leadership and training lapses, breakdowns in discipline and morale problems. Earlier this year, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered two parallel nuclear reviews, still underway, to address his concern that these lapses could erode public trust in the security of the nation's nuclear weapons.


The safety and security of nuclear weapons under military control is considered of paramount importance, and thus defense agencies perform detailed and rigorous inspections at regular intervals.


When the Air Force publicly acknowledged the inspection failure in August, it said "tactical-level errors" had been committed during one phase of the inspection, but it did not say the errors were made by security forces. At the time, the Air Force declined to provide details, saying to do so could expose potential vulnerabilities. Security forces, safety officers, logistics teams, missile launch crews and others participated in the Malmstrom inspection.


Lt. Col. John Sheets, a spokesman for Air Force Global Strike Command, which is responsible for the nuclear missile corps as well as the nuclear-capable bomber aircraft, said Wednesday he could not comment further.


"We cannot divulge additional details of the scenario or the response tactics due to it being sensitive information that could compromise security," Sheets said. He added that all "countermeasures," or corrective actions, that were proposed in the review obtained by the AP have been accomplished. The only exception is a plan for more extensive practicing of security response tactics at launch silos, a move that requires signed agreements with owners of the private land on which the missile silos are situated.


The Aug 5-13, 2013, inspection, designed to evaluate management and handling of nuclear weapons to ensure they are properly controlled at all times, was repeated two months later and found no security weaknesses.


Security forces are responsible for a range of protective roles on the Air Force's three nuclear missile bases, including along roads used to transport missiles and warheads to and from launch silos; at weapons storage facilities; and at launch silos and launch control centers. The Air Force operates three Minuteman 3 bases — in North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming — each with 150 missiles.


The partially censored document provided to the AP describes in broad terms the nature of the inspection failure, its significance and its underlying causes.


It said insufficient training was at the heart of the problem, beginning with a lack of familiarity among the security forces with "complex scenario" exercises. It also cited unspecified shortcomings in "leadership culture" and a lack of standardized simulations not only at Malmstrom but throughout the nuclear missile corps.


Among the corrective measures cited in the report: Arrange to hold recapture exercises at one launch silo among the 50 silos in each of the 341st's three Minuteman squadrons, using "realistic, varied, simple-to-complex" scenarios based on what the Pentagon calls its "local nuclear security threat capabilities assessment." Also, the Air Force is taking steps to more closely track lessons learned from each "recapture" exercise.


The Air Force declined to further explain the August exercise scenario, but the document provided to the AP indicates that a security force team was told to recapture a Minuteman 3 missile launch silo within a certain time limit. It did not identify or otherwise describe the team, but each Minuteman 3 missile base has "tactical response force" teams specially trained and equipped for nuclear weapons recapture and recovery missions.


Two years ago, the Air Force promoted these teams as a "secret weapon" ensuring nuclear security, saying they are provided "an extensive amount of unique training and are expected to perform flawlessly in whatever scenario thrown their way."


It is not clear from available records precisely what Malmstrom's security forces did wrong or inadequately in the August exercise.


A section apparently elaborating on what was meant by the phrase "failed to take all lawful actions" was removed from the document before its release to the AP last week. The Air Force said this information was withheld in accordance with senior-level Pentagon orders "prohibiting the unauthorized dissemination of unclassified information pertaining to security measures" for the protection of "special nuclear material."


Labeling the security forces' misstep a "critical deficiency," the report said that because security of nuclear weapons is paramount, "the inability to demonstrate effective recapture/recovery TTPs (tactics, techniques and procedures) detracts from the Wing's ability to conduct its day-to-day mission."


Col. Robert Stanley, who was commander of the 341st Wing at the time of the failure, said at the conclusion of the inspection that to publicly reveal details of the results would "give America's adversaries far too much information about how we operate." Despite the inspection failure, "there was no question about our capability to operate safely and with complete confidence," Stanley said, adding nonetheless that more needed to be done to ensure that "some very young airmen" understand their responsibilities "much more clearly."


Nine days later he fired the officer in charge of his security forces, Col. David Lynch, and replaced him temporarily with Col. John T. Wilcox II. In March, Stanley resigned amid a scandal involving alleged cheating on proficiency tests by up to 100 missile officers at Malmstrom, and the Air Force replaced Stanley with Wilcox.


In an AP interview in January, Stanley suggested there had been disagreement about how the security exercise was conducted during the August inspection. Without providing specifics, he said it was simulated "in a way that we've never seen before," adding: "It confused our airmen. We were off by a matter of seconds."


The 341st has had other security-related problems over the past year. It disciplined two launch control officers who broke security rules on May 31, 2013, by leaving open the blast door to their underground command center when a maintenance person arrived while one of the two crew members was asleep. Compounding the error, the crew commander and his deputy initially lied to their squadron commander in an attempt to hide the violation.


The 341st also has at least two missile launch officers under criminal investigation for alleged illegal drug use or possession.



Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Mission Family: Spouses require more than good wishes


It’s been 30 years since President Reagan announced the first Military Spouse Appreciation Day — May 23, 1984. Since then, that day has been designated as the Friday before Mother’s Day.


This year’s official Military Spouse Appreciation Day has passed, but no matter. I believe we can show our appreciation for military spouses in at least some small way every day. Whether you’re a civilian or another member of the military community, continue to offer kind and encouraging words to your military spouse friends today and next month. Offer to take the kids to the park for an hour to give your friend some quiet time, or invite them dinner. If you see a need, think about how you can help.


This “appreciation” for military families is perhaps taking hold in the civilian population. In September 2001, military families and service providers may have been the only ones who had an inkling of what lay ahead for them. And while they were asking questions about the effects of wartime deployments on troops, spouses and children as wars flared in Afghanistan and Iraq, it seemed the civilian population took years to start thinking about it.


A lot of credit must go to first lady Michelle Obama and Dr. Jill Biden, wife of Vice President Joe Biden, for bringing many issues to the public’s attention. On the third anniversary of the launch of their Joining Forces campaign to rally the nation around military families, they announced the new Veterans Philanthropy Exchange, a collection of philanthropic groups creating a “stronger, national funding structure for efforts that support our military families.” It will be a way for these groups to share best practices, create new resources and recruit more donors to support military families.


“The best thing about this is the timing,” said Joyce Raezer, executive director of the National Military Family Association, who noted that a five-year commitment at the end of the wars “is important, because they recognize that needs will continue, and in some cases, intensify. We need that kind of message.”


The Defense Department and the services also have expanded existing programs and launched new efforts to meet the needs of military families during wartime and thereafter — such as embedding counselors in communities and in schools; beefing up spouse employment programs with the key involvement of companies who actually want to hire military spouses; providing more resources and information for permanent change-of-station moves; and making the transition to civilian life easier.


But neither the government nor nonprofits can do it all.


“Budget cuts are affecting nonprofits as well,” Raezer said. “We’re affected by the economy just as DoD is. … We can partner and fill in the gaps, but there are things DoD must do for family readiness. I’m worried about this assumption that if they cut the DoD budget, nonprofits and volunteers will magically step in and do what the military used to do.”


A little appreciation can go a long way in the daily lives of military spouses. But advocates say stable funding for critical programs remains key.



Karen Jowers is married to a military retiree.


Obama: Any misconduct at VA will be punished


WASHINGTON — Seeking to head off a growing furor over veterans' health care, President Barack Obama declared Wednesday that allegations of misconduct at VA hospitals are "dishonorable" and will be not be tolerated by his administration.


"I will not stand for it - not as commander in chief but also not as an American," Obama said following an Oval Office meeting with embattled VA Secretary Eric Shinseki.


His administration is under mounting pressure from Capitol Hill to address troubling allegations of treatment delays and preventable deaths at VA hospitals. The VA Inspector General's office said late Tuesday that 26 facilities are being investigated nationwide — up from 10 just last week — including a Phoenix hospital where 40 veterans allegedly died while waiting for treatment and staff there kept a secret list of patients waiting for appointments to hide delays in care.


Shinseki, a retired Army four-star general, is facing calls for his resignation from some lawmakers. Obama spoke warmly of Shinseki Wednesday, saying the secretary had poured his heart and soul into his job, but said there would be accountability if the allegations of misconduct are proven to be true.


"We are going to fix whatever is wrong and so long as I have the privilege of serving as commander in chief, I'm going to keep on fighting to deliver the care and the benefits and the opportunities that you and your families deserve, now and for decades to come," Obama said.


The president spoke hours before the House was scheduled to vote on a bill that would grant the VA secretary more authority to fire or demote senior executives. The White House has said it shares the goals of the House measure - to ensure accountability at the VA - but has concerns about some of the details.


Obama's statement marked his first public comments on the matter in more than two weeks. Last week, he dispatched his deputy chief of staff Rob Nabors to the VA to oversee a review of department policies.


Nabors, who also took part in the Oval Office meeting Wednesday, was heading to Phoenix later in the day to meet with staff at the VA hospital at the center of the allegations. His meeting will include interim director Steve Young and other hospital administrators. Nabors plans to submit a preliminary report to the White House next week, with a full report due in June.


The current director of the Phoenix VA Health Care System, Sharon Helman, has been placed on leave indefinitely while the VA's inspector general investigates the claims raised by several former VA employees. Investigators probing the claims say they have so far not linked any patient deaths in Phoenix to delayed care.


The allegations have sparked election-year outrage on Capitol Hill. The House bill would target about 450 career employees at the VA who serve as hospital directors or executives in the agency's 21 regions.


Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, sponsored the measure, saying VA officials who have presided over mismanagement or negligence are more likely to receive bonuses or glowing performance reviews than any sort of punishment.


The VA's "widespread and systemic lack of accountability is exacerbating all of its most pressing problems," including revelations that the department maintained secret waiting lists to cover up long delays in patient appointments and a mounting toll of preventable deaths of veterans, Miller said.


Miller accused the VA of a "well-documented reluctance to ensure its leaders are held accountable for mistakes" and he said Congress has an obligation to "give the VA secretary the authority he needs to fix things. That's what my bill would do."


Shinseki and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel met with the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday to discuss how the Veterans Affairs and Defense departments can improve interactions between their health records systems. The two Cabinet members said in a joint statement that the meeting was productive and said both men share the same goal: to improve health outcomes of active-duty military, veterans and beneficiaries.


Meanwhile, two Republican senators introduced legislation to prohibit payment of bonuses to employees at the Veterans Health Administration through next year. Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina and Deb Fischer of Nebraska said the VA should focus its spending on fixing problems at the agency, "not rewarding employees entrenched in a failing bureaucracy." Burr is the senior Republican on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee and Fischer is on the Senate Armed Services Committee.


The House passed a bill in February that would eliminate performance bonuses for the department's senior executive staff through 2018.


Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, also called on Obama to back off plans to nominate Jeffrey Murawsky to replace the VA's undersecretary for health care, Robert Petzel, who has stepped down. Murawsky, a career VA administrator, directly supervised Helman from 2010 to 2012.


The White House has said Obama is standing behind Murawsky's nomination.



Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Retired female Army drill sergeant school leader sues


COLUMBIA, S.C. — The first woman to head the Army's Drill Sergeant School at Fort Jackson has filed suit against the government, contending she was the target of racial and sexual discrimination.


In response, U.S. attorneys for the federal government have asked that the claims by now-retired Command Sgt. Maj. Teresa King be dismissed.


U.S. Assistant Attorney Terri Hearn Bailey said in a motion filed earlier this month in federal court in Columbia that the government is immune from the suit under the Feres Doctrine, which "bars this court from hearing tort claims arising out of, or incident to Plaintiff's military service."


Bailey said King's claim of discrimination "should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Title VII does not apply to uniformed service members." Title VII refers to the section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal law that bars employment discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion.


In her suit, King said three of her former Army colleagues undermined her authority and targeted her for removal from her job because she was black and female. They were identified as Command Sgt. Maj. John Calpena, Maj. Gen. Richard Longo and Gen. Robert Cone, the former commander of the Training and Doctrine Command.


Maj. Harold Huff of the Army's Training and Doctrine Command, where the three men served, said, "We do not comment on pending litigation."


Huff said Calpena and Cone have since retired. Longo is serving as Deputy Commanding General/Chief of Staff for the U.S. Army Europe and 7th Army.


The developments in the case were first reported Monday by The Army Times.


King's attorney James Smith said in an interview that she moved forward with her suit because the Army did not respond to her past complaints through normal administrative channels. He said her suit has merit under a "Bivens" claim, which involves a claim against federal officials for a violation of a person's constitutional rights.


King's appointment in 2009 as the first female named to the post was celebrated as an advance for women in the service.


In 2011, she was suspended, barred from the school and not allowed to speak or contact colleagues during an investigation. Several months later, she was put back in her job after the Army said her suspension was unwarranted, but the service offered no details or explanation except to say it involved her conduct.


The command sergeant major contended at the time her superiors had abused their authority and that she was a victim of sexism and racism.


She was forced to step down from her post, and retired months later.


Smith said the actions taken against King were conducted in a "capricious and arbitrary manner."


"She was vindicated, but justice was never done. The Army has never made any effort to take action against those who did this to her," Smith said.


King seeks unspecified damages in the suit and suggests punitive damages as well.


"We have exhausted every avenue, and the Army response has been totally inadequate. She was denied an opportunity at every turn to make her case," said Smith.



IG: VA investigations expanded to 26 facilities


WASHINGTON — The number of VA facilities under investigation after complaints about falsified records and treatment delays has more than doubled in recent days, the Office of Inspector General at the Veterans Affairs Department said late Tuesday.


A spokeswoman for the IG's office said 26 facilities were being investigated nationwide. Acting Inspector General Richard Griffin told a Senate committee last week that at least 10 new allegations about manipulated waiting times and other problems had surfaced since reports of problems at the Phoenix VA hospital came to light last month.


The expanded investigations come as President Barack Obama's choice to help carry out reforms at the Veterans Affairs Department was set to travel to Phoenix to meet with staff at the local VA office amid mounting pressure to overhaul the beleaguered agency.


Obama announced last week that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Rob Nabors would be assigned to the VA after allegations of delayed care that may have led to patient deaths and a cover-up by top administrators in Phoenix. Similar claims have been reported at VA facilities in Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Georgia, Missouri, Texas, Florida and elsewhere.


Nabors met Tuesday in Washington with representatives of several veterans' organizations, including the American Legion and Disabled American Veterans, among others. He will meet Thursday with leadership at the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Medical Center, including with interim director Steve Young, White House spokesman Jay Carney said.


Young took over in Phoenix after director Sharon Helman was placed on leave indefinitely while the VA's Office of Inspector General investigates claims raised by several former VA employees that Phoenix administrators kept a secret list of patients waiting for appointments to hide delays in care.


Critics say Helman was motivated to conceal delays to collect a bonus of about $9,000 last year.


A former clinic director for the VA in Phoenix first came out publicly with the allegations of secret lists in April. Dr. Samuel Foote, who retired in December after nearly 25 years with the VA, says that up to 40 veterans may have died while awaiting treatment at the Phoenix hospital. Investigators say they have so far not linked any patient deaths in Phoenix to delayed care.


The allegations have sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and some calls for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki's resignation. The VA's undersecretary for health care, Robert Petzel, has since stepped down.


However, Republicans denounced the move as a hollow gesture, since Petzel had already been scheduled to retire soon. And several lawmakers are proposing legislation to take on VA problems.


Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, told The Associated Press on Tuesday he plans to introduce legislation this week to ensure that internal probes by the VA's Office of Medical Inspector are released to Congress and the public "so the full scope of the VA's dysfunction cannot be disguised."


Moran noted that a VA nurse in Cheyenne, Wyoming, was put on leave this month for allegedly telling employees to falsify appointment records. The action came after an email about possible wait-list manipulation at the Cheyenne hospital was leaked to the media.


But Moran said the Cheyenne center was already the subject of a December 2013 report by Office of the Medical Inspector. That report apparently substantiated claims of improper scheduling practices, but it's unclear if action taken at the Cheyenne center was based on the medical inspector's findings, Moran said.


"Because OMI reports are not available to the public and have not been previously released to Congress, it is impossible to know whether the VA has taken action to implement the OMI's recommendations for improvement in each case," Moran said.


Meanwhile, two Republican senators introduced legislation to prohibit payment of bonuses to employees at the Veterans Health Administration through next year. Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina and Deb Fischer of Nebraska said the VA should focus its spending on fixing problems at the agency, "not rewarding employees entrenched in a failing bureaucracy." Burr is the senior Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee and Fischer is a panel member.


The House passed a bill in February eliminating performance bonuses for the department's senior executive staff through 2018.


Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, also called on Obama to back off plans to nominate Jeffrey Murawsky to replace Petzel at the VA. Murawsky, a career VA administrator, directly supervised Helman from 2010 to 2012.


The White House has said Obama remains confident in Shinseki's leadership and is standing behind Murawsky's nomination.


Shinseki and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel met with the House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday to discuss how the two departments can improve interactions between their health records systems. The two Cabinet members said in a joint statement that the meeting was productive and that both men share the same goal — to improve health outcomes of active duty military, veterans and beneficiaries.


___


Associated Press writer Brian Skoloff in Phoenix contributed to this report.



Retired female Army drill sergeant commander sues


COLUMBIA, S.C. — The first woman to head the Army's Drill Sergeant School at Fort Jackson has filed suit against the government, contending she was the target of racial and sexual discrimination.


In response, U.S. attorneys for the federal government have asked that the claims by now-retired Command Sgt. Maj. Teresa King be dismissed.


U.S. Assistant Attorney Terri Hearn Bailey said in a motion filed earlier this month in federal court in Columbia that the government is immune from the suit under the Feres Doctrine, which "bars this court from hearing tort claims arising out of, or incident to Plaintiff's military service."


Bailey said King's claim of discrimination "should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Title VII does not apply to uniformed service members." Title VII refers to the section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal law that bars employment discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion.


In her suit, King said three of her former Army colleagues undermined her authority and targeted her for removal from her job because she was black and female. They were identified as Command Sgt. Maj. John Calpena, Maj. Gen. Richard Longo and Gen. Robert Cone, the former commander of the Training and Doctrine Command.


Maj. Harold Huff of the Army's Training and Doctrine Command, where the three men served, said, "We do not comment on pending litigation."


Huff said Calpena and Cone have since retired. Longo is serving as Deputy Commanding General/Chief of Staff for the U.S. Army Europe and 7th Army.


The developments in the case were first reported Monday by The Army Times.


King's attorney James Smith said in an interview that she moved forward with her suit because the Army did not respond to her past complaints through normal administrative channels. He said her suit has merit under a "Bivens" claim, which involves a claim against federal officials for a violation of a person's constitutional rights.


King's appointment in 2009 as the first female named to the post was celebrated as an advance for women in the service.


In 2011, she was suspended, barred from the school and not allowed to speak or contact colleagues during an investigation. Several months later, she was put back in her job after the Army said her suspension was unwarranted, but the service offered no details or explanation except to say it involved her conduct.


The command sergeant major contended at the time her superiors had abused their authority and that she was a victim of sexism and racism.


She was forced to step down from her post, and retired months later.


Smith said the actions taken against King were conducted in a "capricious and arbitrary manner."


"She was vindicated, but justice was never done. The Army has never made any effort to take action against those who did this to her," Smith said.


King seeks unspecified damages in the suit and suggests punitive damages as well.


"We have exhausted every avenue, and the Army response has been totally inadequate. She was denied an opportunity at every turn to make her case," said Smith.



Military’s reduced readiness seen as emboldening China, Russia


When the U.S. could be making a show of strength toward China and Russia as several Pacific flashpoints heat up, it is instead mired in debates about military readiness, troop reductions and deep budget cuts.


The result could be a series of opportunistic “bites-of-an-apple” provocations that fall below the level that would trigger a U.S. military response, eroding confidence in America's commitment to help current and possible allies, analysts say.


INTERACTIVE MAP | Flashpoints of conflict in the Pacific

Earlier this month, China floated a mobile oil-drilling rig in Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone, setting off a standoff of flotillas in which Hanoi claims two of its ships were rammed. Violent riots in Vietnam have left dozens of ethnic Chinese injured or dead.


Just to the west, China recently began preparations for what the Philippines described as a possible military airstrip on a reef in the Spratly Islands, which both countries claim.


Meanwhile, Russia has ratcheted up its presence in the Pacific — including long-range air patrols off the coast of California and near the U.S. territory of Guam — to gather intelligence and display its military might. The Japan Air Self Defense Force almost doubled its number of scrambles against Russian aircraft in the 12 months leading up to March compared with the previous year.


And North Korea has intensified its rhetoric amid what appear to be preparations for its fourth underground nuclear weapons test.


The U.S. still maintains the most formidable force in the Pacific. The Pacific Fleet consists of about 180 ships, which include five aircraft carrier strike groups and almost 2,000 aircraft, according to U.S. Pacific Command. One aircraft carrier and about 65 ships are permanently forward deployed in Japan.


By comparison, as of last year China’s navy had only 52 frigates and 23 destroyers, many of them antiquated, according to the Pentagon’s most recent assessment of China’s military. Russia’s Pacific Fleet consists of a missile cruiser, five destroyers and a few dozen submarines, according to recent news reports.


“The U.S. certainly retains an ability to project an awful lot of air and sea power for more limited contingencies — and do so very quickly,” said Anthony Cordesman, a defense expert at the bipartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.


And even if U.S. forces did become embroiled in Pacific confrontations such as those unfolding in Vietnam and the Philippines, they aren’t the kind of interventions that demand huge follow-up forces, he said.


Cordesman cautioned against equating these kinds of skirmishes with a potential outbreak of hostilities on the Korean peninsula because the U.S. is prepared and willing to match escalation there, he said.


“You’re not going to go to general war over an [exclusive economic zone] or a reef somewhere in the Pacific,” he said.


Still, Cordesman admitted, irrational behavior and miscalculations by adversaries can quickly lead to escalation and “the need for putting many more follow-on forces in the field over time.”


Some experts say that flagging readiness — real or perceived — actually invites escalation by weakening America’s “deterrent effect” as China and Russia continue beefing up their Pacific forces.


In congressional testimony, top-ranking military chiefs have already warned that readiness is deteriorating, partly because of cuts from last year’s sequester at a time the military is struggling to refit and retrain after a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of U.S. forces in South Korea, testified before a Senate subcommittee in March that he was concerned about the readiness of “follow-on forces” that would be required should the peninsula enter crisis.


Marine Corps Commandant Gen. John Amos told the same committee last fall that budget cuts leave “fewer forces, arriving less-trained, arriving later in the fight.”


Reduced readiness cuts two ways, said Todd Harrison, a defense expert with the nonpartisan Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, D.C.


“I think this reduction in readiness that we’re looking at will reduce our confidence in the ability of our military to intervene successfully if called upon,” he said. “That may weaken the deterrent effect on potential adversaries, but it could also create a situation where we self-deter.”


Dakota Wood, a defense expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., said that America’s current budget and readiness woes do not go unnoticed by China and Russia.


“There’s this deterrent value in being strongly forward, being strongly postured and having the perception that not only are your forces ready for action, but that the government in the U.S. is willing to press that case if it comes to it.


“When it comes to China, we are seeing increasing aggressiveness in trying to push forward their territorial claims in the East and South China Seas.


“China is likely viewing this as a window of opportunity to aggressively press its claims in these waters, and the U.S. is not well postured to come to the assistance of friends and allies in the region.”


Wood described this “pattern of conduct” as “taking small bites of an apple,” which over time will consume it.


“So each one of these little actions is below the threshold that would invite a large-scale conventional military response,” he said. “But they’re willing and able to take these small bites because they know the U.S., by this series of incidents, is unwilling to press the case.”


Terrence K. Kelly director of the Strategy and Resources Program at the RAND Corporation, said that individual skirmishes such as these might seem insignificant. But over time countries such as China and Russia can achieve their goals by “nibbling away” with “subresponse-level” aggression, Kelly said.


“It’s probably calculated to slowly over time achieve an effect that won’t elicit a military response from the U.S. or its allies,” he said.


Cordesman said, however, that even a modest U.S. intervention could lead to unintended escalation.


“The problem is that the United States responding — even if it solves one small, short-term problem — may lead to the other side responding in ways that again produce a steady pattern of escalation,” Cordesman said.


Judging by the testimony of the Chiefs of Staff earlier month during a Senate hearing on the Pentagon's proposal to reduce compensation and benefits for troops, the services aren’t hankering for a greater show of force in the Pacific. If Congress doesn't approve those compensation cuts, the Air Force will consider cutting $8.1 billion from readiness, mondernization and infrastructure accounts over the next five years, Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh III told a Senate Committee.


“We’ll take significant cuts to flying hours and weapons system sustainment accounts, reduce precision munitions buys and lower funding for training ranges, digging our readiness hole even deeper,” Welsh said.


olson.wyatt@stripes.com



31st MEU commander resigns on Okinawa amid inquiry


19 minutes ago












Col. John E. Merna, commanding officer of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, talks with local leadership on the ground during the humanitarian response in the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, Nov. 18, 2013.






CAMP FOSTER, Okinawa — The commander of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, considered U.S. military’s preeminent amphibious fighting force in the Asia-Pacific region, has been forced out for allegedly creating a hostile work environment at the unit’s headquarters, Marine Corps officials said Tuesday.


Col. John Merna resigned following a preliminary inquiry within the command element into allegations of “intemperate behavior” and “language,” according to a Marine Corps statement. The allegations were first made in a command climate survey.


Merna’s resignation was accepted by Lt. Gen. John Wissler, commander of the III Marine Expeditionary Force. Merna has been in command of the 31st MEU since June 1, 2012.


“Merna, a combat veteran and a widely respected leader, recognized his incompatibility to continue leading the 31st MEU, accepted responsibility and accountability for his actions, and immediately tendered a letter requesting termination of his command authority and responsibility,” the statement said.


Executive officer Lt. Col. G. Troy Roesti was appointed interim commander, the statement said. Wissler will make a final determination in regard to any additional action based upon a detailed review of the inquiry and climate survey.


Neither Wissler nor Merna were available to comment further Tuesday, according to a Marines spokesman. The inquiry and survey also were not unavailable.


Merna was commissioned as an officer in 1990 after his graduation from Florida State University, according to his Marine Corps biography. He served in Operation Desert Storm and rose quickly through the ranks, becoming a company commander by 1993. He served in Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2004-06.


The 31st MEU has been dubbed the “nation’s force-in-readiness” in the region and includes about 2,200 Marines and sailors, according to a Marines website. They are widely regarded as the tip of the spear for everything from humanitarian assistance to amphibious assaults in the region.


burke.matt@stripes.com




Embassy cautions US citizens after martial law imposed in Thailand


TOKYO — The State Department is advising caution for all U.S. citizens in Thailand, following the declaration of martial law throughout the country Tuesday.


The declaration came a day after Thailand’s caretaker prime minister said he would not resign, amidst ongoing political protests.


“You are advised to avoid areas where there are protest events, large gatherings, or security operations and follow the instructions of Thai authorities,” according to the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok’s statement.


“U.S. citizens are cautioned that even demonstrations that are meant to be peaceful can turn confrontational and escalate into violence.”


The embassy also encouraged Americans in Thailand to register with the embassy, either online or through consulate services.


The warning follows a travel alert issued by the embassy May 16. The alert did not advise against nonessential travel, but it did cite risks, especially in Bangkok, “due to ongoing political and social unrest.”


Thai army officials told reporters Tuesday that the declaration of martial law was a not a coup, an action taken repeatedly by the military since Thailand became a constitutional monarchy in 1932.


In Washington, State Department officials expressed concern over the martial decree.


“We expect the army to honor its commitment to make this a temporary action to prevent violence, and to not undermine democratic institutions,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement Tuesday.


The last coup came in 2006, when the military forced out Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Thaksin had popular support, especially in the countryside, but also faced a strong opposition movement and accusations of corruption.


On May 7, Yingluck Shinawatra, Thaksin’s sister, was forced out as prime minister after a court found her guilty of abuses of power.


The U.S. military maintains a close relationship with Thai military officials. Each year, Thai officials host the multinational Cobra Gold exercise, which welcomes thousands of U.S. servicemembers.


On May 12, senior Navy leaders hosted Royal Thai Navy officials aboard the Japan-based USS Blue Ridge. A Navy news release cited Thailand as “America’s oldest ally in Asia,” tracing relations back to a treaty signed between the U.S. and the Kingdom of Siam in 1833.


slavin.erik@stripes.com

Twitter: @eslavin_stripes



Monday, May 19, 2014

31st MEF commander resigns on Okinawa amid inquiry


48 minutes ago












Col. John E. Merna, commanding officer of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, talks with local leadership on the ground during the humanitarian response in the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan, Nov. 18, 2013.






CAMP FOSTER, Okinawa — The commander of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, considered U.S. military’s preeminent amphibious fighting force in the Asia-Pacific region, has been forced out for allegedly creating a hostile work environment at the unit’s headquarters, Marine Corps officials said Tuesday.


Col. John Merna resigned following a preliminary inquiry within the command element into allegations of “intemperate behavior” and “language,” according to a Marine Corps statement. The allegations were first made in a command climate survey.


Merna’s resignation was accepted by Lt. Gen. John Wissler, commander of the III Marine Expeditionary Force. Merna has been in command of the 31st MEU since June 1, 2012.


“Merna, a combat veteran and a widely respected leader, recognized his incompatibility to continue leading the 31st MEU, accepted responsibility and accountability for his actions, and immediately tendered a letter requesting termination of his command authority and responsibility,” the statement said.


Executive officer Lt. Col. G. Troy Roesti was appointed interim commander, the statement said. Wissler will make a final determination in regard to any additional action based upon a detailed review of the inquiry and climate survey.


Neither Wissler nor Merna were available to comment further Tuesday, according to a Marines spokesman. The inquiry and survey also were not unavailable.


Merna was commissioned as an officer in 1990 after his graduation from Florida State University, according to his Marine Corps biography. He served in Operation Desert Storm and rose quickly through the ranks, becoming a company commander by 1993. He served in Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2004-06.


The 31st MEU has been dubbed the “nation’s force-in-readiness” in the region and includes about 2,200 Marines and sailors, according to a Marines website. They are widely regarded as the tip of the spear for everything from humanitarian assistance to amphibious assaults in the region.


burke.matt@stripes.com