Monday, April 28, 2014

Colorado rejects pot for PTSD treatment


DENVER — Colorado rejected marijuana as a treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder Monday, the third time efforts have failed to add the condition to the list of ailments for which doctors can recommend pot.


Colorado allows any adult over 21 to buy marijuana, but supporters of a bill to add PTSD to the list of eight qualifying conditions to join the state's medical marijuana registry argued that PTSD merits inclusion.


The House State, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee rejected the bill 6-5 Monday evening after lengthy testimony from doctors and veterans. The state Health Department has twice rejected petitions to add PTSD to the list of qualifying conditions.


"This is, to me, not an issue about veterans," said Dr. Larry Wolk, Colorado's chief medical officer and head of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. But he added that inadequate research exists to show marijuana is an effective treatment for PTSD.


Several veterans disagreed, some wiping away tears as they told of struggling with pharmaceuticals to treat PTSD.


"Cannabis made it to where I don't have to take any of these prescription drugs," Iraq War veteran Sean Azzariti testified. "It saved by life."


But two doctors testified that cannabis can make PTSD symptoms worse, or make users more prone to violence or depression.


Dr. Doris Gundersen of the Colorado Psychiatric Society argued that marijuana contains several ingredients, and that giving it to a person with PTSD is "like crushing 15 kinds of antidepressants and dispensing them."


The bill's sponsor, Democratic Rep. Jonathan Singer, of Longmont, argued in vain that doctors would still be better suited than recreational dispensary workers to consider a kind of marijuana to relieve anxiety or other symptoms of PTSD.


"We should not have people consulting cashiers when they should be consulting doctors about their post-traumatic stress conditions," Singer said.


Advocates say including PTSD as a qualifying condition is also necessary because medical marijuana is taxed at much lower rates that recreational pot.


Wolk said his agency would again review research on marijuana as a PTSD treatment, but lawmakers never considered the idea.



Westover Air Reserve Base to lose 300 jobs, half of its C-5s


CHICOPEE, Mass. — Westover Air Reserve Base will lose half its massive C-5 cargo planes and more than 300 jobs as a result of military budget cuts, base officials announced Monday.


Eight of the 439th Airlift Wing's 16 C-5 planes, the largest military aircraft in the U.S., will move to Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas beginning next year, they said.


Air Force officials blamed Pentagon budget cuts for the changes.


The job cuts include the expected loss of 59 full-time enlisted personnel and 275 reservists, although final numbers have yet to be determined, said Brig. Gen. Steven Vautrain, commander of the 439th at Westover.


The aircraft will be moved from Westover starting in March 2015 as part of an upgrade of the C-5 fleet, with the personnel reductions beginning in October 2015, Vautrain said.


Eight of the refurbished aircraft will operate out of the Texas base, and eight new models will remain at Westover.


Vautrain said the changes would not be the end of the air wing or the base.


"We'll remain strong. It's a wonderful base, we have great support from the community and we plan on being here for the long haul," he added.


The job cuts will result in hardship for members of the base, but efforts will be made to place full-time employees into other positions, Vautrain said. Finding positions within the base for reservists will be more challenging, he said, but some may choose to retire and others could find positions at other bases, including Bradley Air National Guard Base in Connecticut and the Otis Air National Guard base on Cape Cod.


The cuts are part of an effort to slash $487 billion from the nation's defense budget over eight years. The winding down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and automatic federal budget cuts hastened the changes at Westover, Vautrain said.


U.S. Rep. Richard Neal, whose district includes Chicopee where the base is located, said Monday the situation remained "fluid" and that he believed there was still time to reverse the decision. He said he planned to arrange a meeting of the Massachusetts congressional delegation with Defense Department officials.


U.S. Sen. Edward Markey also said he found the announcement troubling and would work with Gov. Deval Patrick and the delegation to see if it could be changed.


"Westover is a critical asset for western Massachusetts and the local Chicopee economy," Markey said in a statement.


The C-5 fleet will be upgraded with new engines during the changeover, base officials said. The C-5 can carry a payload of up to 270,000 pounds a distance of up to 6,000 miles, according to the base's website.


The aircraft has been critical in recent U.S. military operations, flying almost 75,000 hours and transporting more than 200,000 tons of cargo between Sept. 11, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2012.


Westover is located on 2,511 acres, making it the nation's largest Reserve base by land mass.



Obama's Asia trip yields better military ties but no trade concessions


MANILA, Philippines — President Barack Obama came to Asia with multiple missions: to advance U.S. trade interests, to reassure allies he’d back them in any serious confrontation with China, and to rebut critics who dismissed his “pivot to Asia” strategy as being less than pivotal.


He’ll return to Washington on Tuesday partly successful.


In Japan and South Korea, Obama reaffirmed treaty obligations and ties with historic allies. In Malaysia, he made strategic inroads in a country that’s long been one of China’s closest friends in Southeast Asia. In the Philippines, he arrived as the two countries signed a defense cooperation agreement that will give the United States military access to a former American colony that two decades ago ordered the United States out.


At a news conference Monday in Manila, his last in Asia before returning to Washington, the president bragged that “our alliances in Asia have never been stronger.”


But it remains to be seen whether Obama’s goodwill trip through Asia will do much to help him at home. For the trip, there were hopes — inflated, some would say — for a breakthrough on a trade liberalization agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If signed, it would help link U.S. businesses to parts of Asia that generate 40 percent of the world’s economic output.


From all appearances, the president couldn’t get even an oral agreement from Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on a way for Japan to lower tariffs against certain U.S. imports, a key step in making the trade pact a reality.


“Progress on security is welcome, but it does not compensate for stasis on trade,” said Don Emmerson, a political scientist at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. “If the pivot is to serve American interests as well as Asian ones, it should be about goods and services, not just guns and planes.”


As Emmerson concedes, this was a trip Obama had to make. The president was originally scheduled to travel to Asia last October — visiting Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia and Brunei — but the budget impasse in Washington forced him to cancel.


With tensions rising in Asia after China’s assertive territorial moves in the East China and South China seas, Obama decided to do a makeup visit to Japan, Malaysia and the Philippines. He added South Korea when Seoul reportedly squawked about being left out.


After landing in Manila on Monday, Obama was met at the Malacanang presidential palace with a cannon salute and a band that played, among other tunes, the theme to “Beverly Hills Cop.” He then ducked inside the palace with President Benigno Aquino III, wiping his brow on a typically steamy Manila day.


Just before he arrived, U.S. and Philippines officials signed the defense pact, which was negotiated over eight months. It gives U.S. forces greater access to the archipelago than they’ve had since the U.S. naval base at Subic Bay was closed in 1992.


At a news conference Monday, Obama stressed that the 10-year agreement won’t result in a reopening of U.S. bases in the Philippines, a former U.S. colony and ground zero for some of the worst fighting in the Pacific during World War II. But it will allow U.S. forces to rotate through the area, “not simply to deal with issues of maritime security, but also to enhance our capabilities” in case of a natural disaster, he said.


Repeatedly in the past week, Obama and his aides have rejected suggestions that his security push in Asia is aimed at countering or containing China, which is claiming territorial control over vast swaths of the South China Sea.


Yet that hasn’t stopped the president from making statements that could be interpreted that way. Referring to China’s dispatch of ships to disputed areas of the South China Sea, Obama pointed to the handful of jurisdictional disagreements the United States has with Canada over some “islands and rocks.” “But we don’t go around sending ships and threatening folks,” he said.


Aaron L. Connelly, a Southeast Asia expert based in Australia, said it would be hard to argue that stronger U.S. ties with the Philippines weren’t an effort to help Manila counter Chinese maritime ambitions. “There are aspects of the pivot that are clearly being done with an eye toward China,” said Connelly, who’s a research fellow in the East Asia Program at the Lowy Institute for International Policy in Sydney.


So far, however, the response from Beijing has been muted, other than a commentary from the state-run Xinhua news service Monday that warned that an “emboldened Manila” could upset Obama’s plan for peace in Asia.


“I was surprised that the reaction was so mild,” Connelly said.


He added that he was encouraged that China last week joined more than 20 other nations in agreeing to a framework aimed at ensuring that miscommunication between naval vessels doesn’t develop into a conflict between nations.


Obama also noted that his visit showed that U.S. relations and alliances in Southeast Asia have never been stronger. “As recently as a decade ago, there were great tensions between us and Malaysia,” the president said, a marked contrast to the warm welcome he received from Prime Minister Najib Razak when he visited that nation’s capital, Kuala Lumpur, on Sunday and Monday.


On nearly every stop in Asia, the president offered tributes to victims of disasters, including families who lost loved ones in the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 and those who lost family members in the recent Korean ferry disaster.


At a state dinner Monday night at Malacanang Palace, the president told the audience that Americans were grieving for victims of the tornadoes and storms that ripped through the U.S. over the weekend. “But we draw strength from your example” in how the Philippines recovered from November’s Hurricane Haiyan, he said.


Charles E. Morrison, the president of the East-West Center in Honolulu, an independent, U.S.-government funded center that promotes better relations among the United States, Asia and the Pacific, said each of these disasters had an upside for the United States, underscoring “the unparalleled capabilities of the U.S. to respond” in an emergency. Disaster aid after Haiyan won over millions of Filipinos, and Malaysia’s prime minister praised the United State for its assistance in searching for MH-370.


Overall, said Morrison, Obama’s trip was a success. He said it was wise of the administration to include Japan and South Korea, since that helped the president prepare for his next trip to Asia, a visit to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Beijing in November.


As for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Morrison said he had few expectations that Obama would be able to land a breakthrough in Tokyo. “The Japanese are the most difficult country to negotiate with because they often let petty interests get in the way of the greater good,” he said in an email exchange.


Stanford’s Emmerson said it was disappointing that the president couldn’t get more commitment from Japan on resolving trade disputes, given the support the White House is lending Tokyo on disputes with China.


“Whether President Obama’s trip to Asia is judged a success or not depends on the criterion used,” he said. “If his administration’s ‘pivot’ to Asia boils down to showing up, he has certainly done that in four Asian countries.”



A who's who of Putin's friends hit by US sanctions


MOSCOW — The seven people from Russian President Vladimir Putin's inner circle targeted with U.S. sanctions on Monday include men who have helped Putin restore Kremlin control over Russia's economy and its political system. They have been tasked with carrying out some of Putin's most ambitious projects, most notably his plans to make Crimea an integral part of Russia after seizing the peninsula from Ukraine.


There were already 20 people on the list. The United States also added 17 Russian companies.


Putin publicly has scorned the West's efforts to pressure him over the crisis in Ukraine, where a pro-Russia militia has been working to undermine the new Western-supported government in Kiev. "No sanctions can be effective in the modern world and they never produce the desired effect," Putin declared last week.


Still, the first round of sanctions has harmed Russia's economy, as Putin acknowledged, and the only positive news from the new round was that many feared they would be even worse.


Here is a list of the Russian officials and companies targeted:


OLEG BELAVANTSEV


Belavantsev, 64, was a political unknown until Putin appointed him to be his envoy to Crimea last month, on the same day that Russia formally annexed the Ukrainian peninsula. He graduated from a naval institute in Sevastopol, the Crimean port that is the home of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, and his career has been closely tied to that of Sergei Shoigu, now the Russian defense minister.


SERGEI CHEMEZOV


Chemezov has known Putin since the 1980s, when they lived in the same apartment complex in Dresden, East Germany, where Putin served in the KGB. Since 2007, he has headed Rostec, an immense state-owned holding company formed around arms exporter Rosoboronexport. In 2011, the U.S. Defense Department awarded Rosoboronexport a controversial contract to supply 63 Mi-17 helicopters to Afghanistan's security forces that swelled to more than $1 billion. Rostec itself has not been sanctioned. Chemezov, 61, joined the board of state oil company Rosneft in 2013.


DMITRY KOZAK


A deputy prime minister since 2008, Kozak has often been chosen by Putin to pull off his major projects. Kozak, 55, was the government point man overseeing preparations for the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, a priority of Putin's presidency and the most expensive games in history with a price tag topping $50 billion. No sooner had the Olympics come to an end than Putin found another project for him: managing the integration of Crimea into Russia.


YEVGENY MUROV


As head of the Federal Protective Service since 2000, Murov, a 68-year-old army general, oversees thousands of officers charged with protecting the Russian president and other high-ranking officials. The agency traces its origins to the KGB directorate that guarded the Kremlin and the ruling Communist Party's offices in Soviet times.


ALEXEI PUSHKOV


The chairman of the international affairs committee in the lower house of Russia's parliament, Pushkov is best known as the longtime anchor of the weekly television political show "Postscriptum," which serves as a platform for his hawkish, anti-Western views. Pushkov, 59, also expresses his opinions on Twitter, as in this post from last week: "Calling Russia a 'regional power,' Obama has only shown the depth of this despair over the growing global role of Russia from Syria to Ukraine."


IGOR SECHIN


Now president of state-owned oil company Rosneft, Sechin has worked for Putin since the early 1990s and is known for his total loyalty. Sechin, 53, was seen as the mastermind behind the 2003 assault that bankrupted private oil company Yukos and sent its billionaire founder Mikhail Khodorkovsky to prison for 10 years. The most lucrative parts of Yukos ended up with Rosneft, making it Russia's largest oil company. Under Sechin, Rosneft took over BP's Russia venture and formed a major partnership with ExxonMobil that gives the Russian company access to ExxonMobil's projects in Alaska.


VYACHESLAV VOLODIN


As first deputy chief of the Kremlin staff since late 2011, Volodin, 50, has overseen the Kremlin-managed political system. His tenure has coincided with a wave of legislation cracking down on civil society and anti-Kremlin protests. The U.S. Treasury said that Putin's decision to move into Crimea was believed to have been based on consultations with his closest advisers, including Volodin.


COMPANIES


Most of the 17 companies on the list are controlled by three businessmen with close links to Putin: Gennady Timchenko and brothers Boris and Arkady Rotenberg, all of whom were targeted by the first round of U.S. sanctions imposed in March.


One of the companies Timchenko owns is Stroytransgaz, a construction company that has amassed millions in contracts to build pipelines for state-owned Transneft. The company has recently expanded and won lucrative deals to build highways and soccer arenas for the 2018 World Cup in Russia. Among the other companies on the Treasury Department list is the Volga Group, Timchenko's investment vehicle.


Stroygazmontazh is a construction company owned by the Rotenberg brothers. The company has won a handful of contracts to build gas pipelines for state gas giant Gazprom, including the South Stream pipeline to go under the Black Sea. Gazprom's contracts account for the most of the company's revenues. The Rotenbergs also own InvestCapitalBank and SMP Bank, which also were hit by Monday's sanctions.


Two of the sanctioned companies are owned or controlled by Bank Rossiya, the only business targeted by the first round of sanctions and described by the Treasury Department as the personal bank for senior Russian officials.



Inaugural Bragg marathon will be a race with 'hooah'


The path of the inaugural All-American Marathon is paved with “hooah.”


The massive May 4 road race through Fort Bragg, N.C., and surrounding Fayetteville will pass two howitzers, Pope Field, the Airborne and Special Operations Museum and the post’s two “Iron Mike” monuments.


“You’re going right through the heart of all the operational sides of Fort Bragg,” said post spokesman Tom McCollum. “You will see where our soldiers live, the equipment they use and ... runners should see aircraft taking off right over their heads.”


It’s so much “hooah,” organizers envision the race becoming the Army’s official marathon and one to rival the Marine Corps Marathon held every October in Washington, D.C.


There is already an Army Ten-Miler, also held every October in Washington and sponsored by the Army Military District of Washington. There’s also The Army Marathon, held in the spring, sponsored by a nonprofit organization and held outside Fort Hood, Texas.


But Fort Bragg organizers feel they can lay claim to the title “official Army marathon” because their race will be sponsored by the Army and will be run on an Army installation.


“Fort Hood has a marathon — it doesn’t go onto the installation,” McCollum said.


Fort Bragg organizers say this year’s 26.2-mile competition, half-marathon and family-friendly 5-kilometer run are expected to attract more than 3,000 runners from 46 states, 1,000 volunteers and one very special guest: Meb Keflezighi, on the heels of his 2014 Boston Marathon win.


Keflezighi, the first American male to win the Boston Marathon in more than three decades, came to the U.S. as a refugee from Eritrea. He will be the keynote speaker at a pre-race pasta dinner, but he is not running.


The race starts in the city’s Festival Park, travels down the All-American Expressway, through five parks, and through the post. There’s little shade, so volunteers will line the route, passing hydrating drinks to runners.


It all ends with Miss North Carolina and her court handing out medals at the finish line, and a demonstration from the Black Daggers parachute team.


For security, organizers are trying to keep a balance between opening Bragg’s doors and keeping the post secure. To that end, they are adapting its procedures for its annual July 4 celebration, which sees 40,000 visitors — far fewer than the marathon.


To enter the post, the public will have to show a government ID and submit to vehicle searches. Spectators attending the “Finish Fest” will have to undergo a bag check. Runners will not be allowed to compete with bags.


“We are going to make this as secure as possible for our spectators, but we are still trying to open ourselves,” said Rachel Quesada, race director.


Visitors who know they are coming onto the post can register for a 30-day pass that will speed their entry. The process involves a criminal background check.


To become an official Army marathon, Fort Bragg would have to establish an independent entity to run it, and the event would have to be self-sustaining, among other requirements.


“We are operating at a loss this year, but we’re considering it an investment in the future,” Quesada said. “We really want to grow this race into the Army’s marathon and become a nationally recognized race.”


The next race is set for March 22, 2015.


“It’s definitely going to be much bigger than it is this year,” McCollum said.



Report: Pentagon to destroy $1B in ammunition


WASHINGTON — The Pentagon plans to destroy more than $1 billion worth of ammunition although some of those bullets and missiles could still be used by troops, according to the Pentagon and congressional sources.


It's impossible to know what portion of the arsenal slated for destruction — valued at $1.2 billion by the Pentagon — remains viable because the Defense Department's inventory systems can't share data effectively, according to a Government Accountability Office report obtained by USA TODAY.


The result: potential waste of unknown value.


"There is a huge opportunity to save millions, if not billions of dollars if the (Pentagon) can make some common-sense improvements to how it manages ammunition," said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., and chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. "Despite years of effort, the Army, Navy and Air Force still don't have an efficient process for doing something as basic as sharing excess bullets. This Government Accountability Office (GAO) report clearly shows that our military's antiquated systems lead to millions of dollars in wasteful ammunition purchases."


The Army and Pentagon, in a statement, acknowledged "the need to automate the process" and will make it a priority in future budgets. In all, the Pentagon manages a stockpile of conventional ammunition worth $70 billion.


The effect of inaccurate accounting of ammunition for troops at war was outside the scope of the study. However, there were limited supplies at times of .50-caliber machine gun and 9mm handgun ammunition at the height of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a senior military officer who spoke on condition of anonymity to talk about the issue.


"We simply cannot afford this type of waste and ineffectiveness," Carper said. "The (Pentagon) has a responsibility to efficiently manage its ammunition stocks, not only because it is important to be fiscally responsible, but also because our antiquated ammunition inventory systems can shortchange our war fighters and compromise their ability to complete their mission."


Other key findings from the report:


• The services have inventory systems for ammunition that cannot share data directly despite working for decades to develop a single database. Only the Army uses the standard Pentagon format; "the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps operate with formats that are obsolete."


• The services hold an annual conference to share information about surplus ammunition and swap bullets and other munitions as needed. Data about ammunition left over after the meeting disappears from the books, resulting in an unknown amount of good bullets headed to the scrap heap.


• The Army, although required by regulation, had not reported annually on its missile stockpile until last month, shortly before the GAO study was to be released.


The report illustrates the obsolete nature of the Pentagon's inventory systems for ammunition. A request for ammunition from the Marine Corps, for example, is e-mailed to the Army. The e-mail is printed out and manually retyped into the Army system because the services cannot share data directly. Not only is this time consuming, but it can introduce errors — by an incorrect keystroke, for example.


Waste, buying new ammunition while usable stockpiles exist, can occur "because the Army does not report information on all available and usable items," the report states. The annual conference among the services — although it saves about $70 million per year, according to the Pentagon — is inadequate. The services, in fiscal year 2012, exchanged 44 million items, including 32 million bullets for machine guns and pistols.


"Specifically, the Army's report does not include information from prior years about usable ammunition that was unclaimed by another service and stored for potential foreign military sales or slated for potential disposal," the report says.


Missiles are another source for concern, the report notes. The Army has an inventory of missiles, including Stingers, Javelins and Hellfires, that has totaled more than $14 billion in recent years. Hellfire missiles have been a weapon of choice for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in the CIA-run Predator and Reaper drone missions to kill terrorists in places like Yemen.


The GAO found that the Army and its missile command "do not contribute to required annual report." The reason, Army officials told investigators, is that it "rarely has items to offer for redistribution."


Without its cooperation, the Army "risks others services spending additional funds to procure missiles that are already unused and usable in the Army's stockpile."


The Army, in a statement, said that it began offering that information to the other services last month.


In its recommendations, the GAO urged Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to require the Army to make known information on all available for use by all services.



Navy is pressed to address safety of Red Hill tanks


Three months after an underground storage tank leaked up to 27,000 gallons of jet fuel, Navy contractors last week began to inspect the tank at Red Hill.


Meanwhile, Honolulu City Council members joined the chorus of officials urging the Navy to make improvements quickly to prevent what Honolulu Board of Water Supply Manager Ernest Lau said could be a harrowing hazard to Oahu's water supply if a powerful earthquake were to disturb the ground in the area.


The leak at Tank 5 of the Navy's Red Hill bulk fuel storage facility was discovered Jan. 13. Navy, state Department of Health and Board of Water Supply officials have said to date there are no indications that fuel has contaminated the groundwater aquifer. Elevated levels of hydrocarbons were found in soil vapor samples at nearby monitoring points.


The cause of the leak has not been determined.


Tom Clements, environmental public affairs officer for Navy Region Hawaii, said the 245-foot-tall tank holds 12,500 gallons and could envelop a structure the size of Aloha Tower.


The inspection is "a large endeavor" that required the tank to be vented before lighting, scaffolding and other safety features could be put in place, he said.


The inspection, which began Thursday, is expected to take several weeks, Clements said.


Capt. Mike Williamson, commanding officer of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, in a release Thursday said all drinking water samples have been in compliance with state and federal regulations.


"We are wholly committed to protecting the environment and our vital fresh water resources," William­son said. "I believe we have taken prudent measures to ensure the water remains safe to drink and we look forward to continue working collaboratively with all stakeholders to ensure public safety while maintaining this critical national strategic asset."


The 20-tank storage facility, built during World War II, provides fuel for ships and aircraft at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam about 2.5 miles away.


An initial release response report that the Navy submitted to the Health Department Thursday sums up the history of the facility, outlines what happened and details actions the military has taken so far.


A risk summary states there is no way for the underground fuel to reach the surface because there are no connecting seeps.


But the fuel could conceivably reach the water table, which "may result in unacceptable concentrations of petroleum in the Red Hill sub-basin," the report says.


The sub-basin feeds a nearby Navy-run water system, so such a release could decrease the amount of potable water available to Pearl Harbor-Hickam consumers, the report says. The well provides 24 percent of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor system, which serves 52,200 military consumers.


The report concludes: "Additional release response actions, including site characterization, remediation of contamination, and installa­tion of additional groundwater monitoring wells, are recom­- mended to protect drinking water sources located down-gradient of the facility." Down gradient refers to the movement of liquid from areas of high concentration to areas of lower concentration.


The report's executive summary says a contractor is looking at modifying the existing groundwater protection plan and related work. Additionally, the Navy is seeking a contractor to "define the nature, extent and magnitude of soil and groundwater contamination beneath Tank 5" and related work.


The report notes that a four-year project to clean, inspect and repair Tank 5 was completed in December and that fuel was added to the tank on Dec. 9, just over a month before the leak was detected.


At Honolulu Hale Wednesday, the Council Public Works and Sustainability Committee heard BWS Manager Lau and Water Quality Division Chief Erwin Kawata voice their worries about the situation and the need for the city to press the Navy for more improvements promptly.


Five wells that provide up to 11.5 percent of the 140 million gallons used daily by Oahu consumers are within several miles of the storage facility, Lau said.


The board's Halawa Shaft is 5,000 feet northwest of Red Hill while the Moanalua wells are about 1.3 miles away. Collectively, the two water sources account for more than 25 percent of the water serving the area between Moana­lua and Hawaii Kai.


If a large earthquake occurs, "when you think about the large volume of fuel that's currently stored there … even if you leaked a small percentage of that, you would still have a significant volume that would reach the groundwater aquifer," Lau said. "And keep in mind the bottom of the tank itself is only roughly about 100 feet above the drinking water aquifer table, so it doesn't have very far to travel. So we are very concerned."


He said records show that a 1948 earthquake on Oahu that measured 4.6 in magnitude occurred about the same time that a 1,100-gallon leak happened at one of the fuel tanks.


The Navy put up five groundwater monitoring wells from 2005 to 2009, but there needs to be more, Lau said.


A 2010 study paid for by the Navy indicates that groundwater in the Red Hill area flows in a northwesterly pattern, which puts its path in the direction of the Halawa Shaft, Kawata said. There are no water monitoring wells along the way, he said.


The water officials also said the Navy has reported there have been dozens of fuel releases in the past totaling 1.2 million gallons, and that the Health Department did not tell BWS officials about this until the recent leak was discussed.


"I'm just extremely concerned by what I perceive to be a slow response from the Navy," Councilman Breene Harimoto said during a briefing given by Lau at a Council Public Works and Sustainability Committee meeting.


Harimoto, who represents an area between Aiea and Waipahu, said he is also troubled that city officials were not informed of previous leaks until the January leak.


Noting the frequency of earthquakes around the Pacific Rim in recent weeks, Harimoto said he is authoring a resolution urging the Navy to take more and more immediate action. The state Legislature has passed a similar resolution.


"There's a lot of concerns and uncertainty, partly because there are so few hard answers that we've received on the remediation measures, next steps and best practices that should be taken next." Council Public Works Chairman Stanley Chang said.


Lau said the Navy seems to be "open to a few monitoring wells at this point," although he indicated there is disagreement over how many.


Clements said the Navy is working with the Health Department and BWS to make improvements, and is talking to the Environmental Protection Agency and Health Department about the possibility of stricter regulations involving the tanks.


A 2008 Navy report obtained by the Honolulu Star-Advertiser last month noted that steps have been taken to improve monitoring for leaks, but also raised concerns about the age of the facility and the potential for leaks from the tanks.