Tuesday, April 29, 2014

After outcry, Hagel orders review of female hairstyle policies


33 minutes ago












A composite illustration shows various slides from the Army's regulations on hair styles for women.






WASHINGTON — Following an outcry by members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel is considering changing hairstyle regulations that affect female African-American servicemembers.


On Tuesday, Hagel sent a letter to lawmakers announcing that, within 30 days, each of the services will review the definitions of authorized and prohibited hairstyles contained in each of their respective policies and revise any language that might be considered offensive.


Caucus members had complained that a recently updated Army regulation governing troops’ hairstyles was racist and unfairly targeted African-American women.


“The use of words like ‘unkempt’ and ‘matted’ when referring to traditional hairstyles worn by women of color are offensive and biased. The assumption that individuals wearing these hairstyles cannot maintain them in a way that meets the professionalism of Army standards indicates a lack of cultural sensitivity conducive to creating a tolerant environment for minorities,” all 16 female members of the Congressional Black Caucus wrote in a letter to Hagel dated April 10.


At that time, Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Alayne Conway said the development of the revised policy was done carefully over three years and was based on broad input.


“African American female Soldiers were involved in the process of developing the new female hair standards,” she said in an emailed statement. “Not only were nearly 200 senior female leaders and soldiers (which included a representative sample of the Army’s populations) part of the decision-making process on the female hair standards, but the group was also led by an African American female.”


Hagel has also ordered the services to conduct a three-month review of their hairstyle policies as they pertain to African-American women. The purpose of the review is “to ensure standards are fair and respectful of our diverse force, while also meeting our military services’ requirements,” Hagel said in the letter, which was obtained by Stars and Stripes.


The review could lead to a broadening of the types of hairstyles that female servicemembers are allowed to wear.


“After a thorough review of the Service recommendations, I will make whatever appropriate adjustments to DOD policy are necessary,” Hagel wrote.


harper.jon@stripes.com

Twitter: @JHarperStripes




Navy explores new roles with first-in-class USNS Spearhead


ABOARD THE USNS SPEARHEAD IN LAGOS, NIGERIA — The engines rumbled to life, the impellers clutched in and this 2,500-ton catamaran slid away neatly from its pier.


Spearhead is not your typical Navy ship. First in a new class of high-speed, highly maneuverable vessels designed to move troops and cargo quickly, it has a light build, a shallow draft and a large mission bay that make it attractive for a variety of missions, something the Navy has explored over the past four months of the ship’s maiden deployment.


In Ghana, the ship hosted a boarding party targeting illegal fishing vessels. It went pierside in Lagos to kick off an annual exercise with African nations. And in Cameroon it served as a training space for special operators.


“I think it provides a very flexible option across the spectrum of operations, and we’ve just started to tap that potential,” said Capt. John Rinko, commander of the logistics task force for U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa.


The concept of a cargo catamaran was first validated by the Royal Australian Navy, when its high-speed experimental vessel, the Jarvis Bay, was used to ferry more than 20,000 peacekeepers to East Timor starting in 1999. The Navy leased a similar catamaran, the Swift, for nearly a decade ending in 2013, using it as transport for Marines and for U.S. trainers going to Africa and South America.


With Spearhead, the Navy is preparing a wider role for catamarans across theaters. The ship is the first of 10 Joint High Speed Vessels purchased by the service and operated by its Military Sealift Command, which handles the service’s support and sealift vessels. Three have been delivered, and a fourth has been christened. The contract price is $160 million per ship.


Created to ferry ground troops and special operators quickly between shores, Spearhead is built of lightweight aluminum and driven by a jet-propulsion system.


The ship is fast for a vessel of its size, reaching 35 knots (about 40 mph, the speed of a small boat). It has a mission bay of 20,000 square feet, a ramp that can hold 100 tons — enough for a fully loaded tank — and a passenger room with more than 300 reclining airline-style seats, overhead TVs and racks for weapons and equipment.


The ship arrives as the Navy talks increasingly of modularity, or the ability to configure a single ship for different missions. It also comes as high demand for warships in places like the Pacific limit availability in other theaters.


That’s especially true in regions such as this one, the Gulf of Guinea, where piracy and illegal fishing are ongoing problems, and where local forces often lack the training or resources to enforce their maritime boundaries.


The U.S. naval command for Africa runs training and regular exercises in the area, but it has lacked a dedicated ship since SWIFT’s departure, relying on a Dutch vessel for training with several countries last fall.


Spearhead or one of its follow-on vessels will likely fill that role in the future. For the current deployment, Spearhead participated in two African exercises, as well as the boarding piece in Ghana. It visited ports in Senegal, Ghana and Gabon, and after a brief return to Norfolk, Va., it will head to South American waters for a similar tour.


The Navy hasn’t said where it plans to station the ships, and Rinko said possible ports are still being evaluated.


The JHSV represents a departure for Military Sealift Command, whose vessels are typically mission-specific and include oil tankers and hospital ships. Spearhead has a crew of 26 mariners, all of whom juggle multiple duties (the ship was designed for a military crew of 46).


“We’re working with groups that we don’t always work with,” Capt. Douglas Casavant, the ship’s civilian master, said. “And we’re proving a number of different capabilities that the ship wasn’t necessarily designed for. We’re finding out a lot of things.”


The Navy plans to pair the JHSV program with what it calls “adaptive force packages,” or swappable mission configurations. Its most recent deployment included detachments drawn to work with African forces.


In Ghana, a Coast Guard law enforcement team helped with interdictions, and a pair of Riverines flew a small UAV to view the ships being boarded. An embarked security team picked up in Spain scanned the horizon for other threats.


For Casavant, whose history with Spearhead goes back more than three years, the deployment sets the pace for the rest of the ships in the class.


“It’s a lot bigger than just the 75 guys that are on it,” he said.


beardsley.steven@stripes.com

Twitter: @sjbeardsley



Golf course at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson closes


JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, ALASKA — There won’t be a mulligan for a military-operated golf course in Anchorage.


Officials with Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson announced Monday that the Eagleglen Golf Course won’t open in 2014.


The military operates Eagleglen and two courses at Moose Run. The decision to shed one was prompted by a 37 percent decrease in players in the last decade and losses of over $2 million in the last five years.


Most of the players on the courses are civilians, and Anchorage golfers earlier encouraged the military to keep all courses open.


Eagleglen will be open for cross-country skiing in the winter. Summer uses are being investigated.


The Anchorage base is not the first to lose a golf course. Officials say base golf courses have closed in Florida, Nebraska and Kansas in recent years.



Discovery Channel reality show star trades fire over combat experience


Joe Teti says he had two goals when he decided to become a reality TV star.


“One, I wanted to be a good role model for kids. My second goal was to represent the special operations community as a whole in a good light,” Teti, co-star of Discovery Channel’s “Dual Survival,” tells Military Times. “I wanted to portray to the public what an average special operations guy is.”


The hit reality show returned for its fourth season April 23. The idea is simple: Team a former military man with a hippie survivalist and see how they cope with extreme environments. It’s as much about the friction of the odd-couple pairing as surviving the situation.


But with déjà vu-like accusations of an inflated combat résumé, a mysterious midseason firing of Teti’s co-star, a fatal helicopter crash and a raging online feud, much of the drama is playing out behind the scenes — and on social media.


In the eye of the storm is Teti, the show’s military expert now filming his second season. And in a bizarre case of reality TV gone wild, among those leveling charges is Teti’s former Army Special Forces teammate and friend — himself a survival show star.


Some of the questions getting stirred up in the fray:


What credentials landed him the show?


According to his biography, posted on both the Discovery Channel’s site and his personal website, Teti says he served in both the Marine Corps’ elite Force Recon — during the 1980s, he tells OFFduty —and Army Special Forces — on and off during the ’90s through 2001. His bio says he’s a “former operator in a highly classified government counter-terrorist unit.” He claims he is a “combat veteran of both [Operation Iraqi Freedom] and [Operation Enduring Freedom]in Afghanistan.”


Teti says he never claimed to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan while in uniform.


“Never have I said that I served in the military in Iraq or Afghanistan,” he tells Military Times. “I want to clear the record right now. I was in a government counterterrorism unit doing direct action missions right alongside Tier 1 assets.”


He says he worked as a contractor in Iraq three times and Afghanistan five times, with each tour between three and five months long. But he says the unit he worked for is so classified that he can’t provide rough dates or even what years he spent downrange.


Even mentioning which government agency he worked for as a contractor is off limits.


“Don’t even guess about it because that will get you in big trouble. Don’t even take liberties at guessing because you’re actually crossing a legal line right there. ... I am not at liberty to discuss — ethically, legally, morally — who I worked for.”


Teti says he left the Marine Corps as a corporal and was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard as a staff sergeant.


In a statement, a senior Discovery executive says Teti brings valuable skills to the show.


“There is no single criterion we use in selecting characters for our survival shows. Each survivalist brings an expertise to this series acquired from various personal and other experiences that help demonstrate a wide range of survival skill sets in action. Joe provided us with documentation that supports his bona fides in the survival world,” said Paul Schur, Discovery vice president for communications.


He looks legit. What's the big deal?


The Internet’s self-appointed guardians of military correctness take exception to Teti’s “combat veteran” claim. Over the course of a decade of war, they’ve seen skyrocketing numbers of people inflating — at best — their military histories, and several known cases have played out on reality shows. Contestants on “American Idol” and “America’s Got Talent” have made headlines, and Military Times broke the story of a Marine who faked his combat résumé as a contestant on “The Next Food Network Star.”


Retired Army Sgt. 1st Class Jonn Lilyea runs the popular military blog This Ain’t Hell. He writes that while Teti’s military records largely check out — he was in the Marine Corps and Army Special Forces — “he could hardly be a ‘combat veteran of OIF and OEF’ as he claims in his bio in the way that most of us understand the term ‘veteran.’ ”


Mary Schantag, who heads both the POW Network and FakeWarriors.org, has investigated some 5,000 contested claims of combat experience and valor medals. She contends that a contractor simply cannot earn the same status that a military member can.


“I don’t care if you’re a veteran of however many contracting scenarios,” she said. “It does not make you a combat veteran.”


Teti says many of the claims on the blogs are false and believes that at least one, Military Phonies, could be a “fake page” propagated by another reality star formerly featured on Discovery. (Marine veteran Scott Hughes, moderator of Military Phonies, assures Military Times he has been investigating valor claims for three years.)


What's fueling this public feud?


Teti’s former Special Forces commander, retired Capt. Mykel Hawke, who spent 25 years in the Army — split among active-duty, National Guard and Reserve units — before retiring in 2011, doesn’t dispute Teti’s military service record.


If Hawke’s name sounds familiar, it’s because these days he stars in Travel Channel’s “Lost Survivors” along with his wife, Ruth. The pair previously starred in Discovery’s “Man, Woman, Wild.”


Before the dustup, both Teti and Hawke say they were good friends. But their beef — heating up on Facebook over the past several months — goes much deeper than the combat claim.


Hawke was helping Teti get into show business,and the pair were working on a movie project together until they split over a development disagreement in 2011, Hawke says. Their feud took on a higher public profile after a deadly helicopter crash last year.


Three people aboard the chopper were killed Feb. 10, 2013, in Southern California as filming began for the pilot of another Discovery Channel military-themed reality show that Teti was helping produce.


Among those killed was Michael Donatelli, a Special Forces veteran and Hawke and Teti’s mutual friend.


Hawke says the show was going to be called “Lone Operator” — the same name as Teti’s personal consulting businesses — and feature Teti as the star. The project was canceled after the accident, and Teti instead was enlisted into another season of “Dual Survival.”


Now Hawke says Teti has been trying to woo away endorsement deals he has with at least four companies.


Teti will tell you he believes Hawke is possessed by demons.


With several lawsuits pending on the helicopter crash, Discovery Channel officials declined to comment. Teti denies all claims made by Hawke.


Have other vets who knew him weighed in?


Teti provided three personal letters of reference to Military Times. An Army colonel commended his work as an instructor at the United Arab Emirates’ Special Operations School in 2009, and an Army captain praised Teti’s work as a marksmanship instructor in 2001.


But troops who served with Teti aren’t impressed with his combat claim, especially in light of the fact that he left the military right after 9/11.


“If he’s claiming to be a combat veteran because he’s a ‘veteran’ of ‘combat’ as a contractor, then that is unconscionable,” says a current field-grade officer who served with Teti. “We had two SF operators badly wounded on that [post-9/11] deployment, and they are the real ‘combat veterans’ in my book.”


OK - but is it good TV?


In the “Dual Survival” Season 4 premiere, Teti and co-star Cody Lundin find themselves chest-deep in a crocodile-infested Sri Lankan mangrove swamp with a knife and a spare bandana.


Teti lays the military vernacular on thick. A plastic tub isn’t cracked — it’s “compromised.” A crab trap crafted from sticks and vines is a “fire-and-forget weapon.” He must do “force protection” each night before bedding down.


He freaks out just a little facing down a cobra, and he gets stuck in a hole, requiring rescue by his barefoot counterpart.


But you leave with the impression that he respects his survival “brother.” To the extent you’re able to suspend your disbelief, you’re impressed that he caught a huge “mud crab” in that trap — and got away from the elephants and the leopard that was never seen, only heard.


When previews for “Naked and Afraid” break up the drama, you realize “Dual Survival” is a prize specimen of reality TV — and Teti is a big part of why it works.



OFFduty editor Amanda Miller contributed to this report.


New Balance gains from military rule change


The Pentagon will begin requiring the athletic shoes that new recruits purchase with military allowances be American made, a change supporters hope will ensure about $180 million in sneaker allowances are spent on domestic products.


The Department of Defense has long required that many of the goods it purchases be American made as much as possible, though the new recruit athletic shoe allowance has been exempted.


The change, announced on Friday, could be a boon to Boston-based New Balance, which operates its largest plant in Lawrence, and another Michigan-based footwear company that already produce a line of sneakers that meet military specifications.


Matt LeBretton, director of public affairs for New Balance, has said the change could create up to 200 jobs, many of which would be in Lawrence.


“Innovative companies, such as New Balance right here in Massachusetts are able to provide our service members with quality products and keep business here on American soil,” Congresswoman Niki Tsongas, D-Lowell, said in a statement. “This policy change will boost job growth, spur economic development and innovation and give the brave men and women of our armed forces better gear.”


Tsongas filed legislation last year with Maine Congressman Mike Michaud to require the allowances be used on American-made shoes, but the Pentagon decided to change the policy without an act of Congress.


“DoD has an interest in having our recruits purchase domestically manufactured athletic shoes to the maximum extent practicable in order to abide by the spirit of the Berry Amendment,” Acting Deputy Secretary of Defense Christine Fox said in a statement.


The Berry Amendment refers to the 1941 policy that military equipment made of textiles be completely American made.


Massachusetts manufacturer New Balance now produces a 100-percent Berry Amendment-compliant shoe that costs less than the current Army allowance, according to Tsongas’ office.


New Balance has two factories in Massachusetts — Brighton and Lawrence — and three in Maine where it manufactures its athletic wear. Lawrence is the biggest facility and includes testing and research and development. Requiring recruits to use their military allowance on 100-percent-American-manufactured footwear would give a boost to New Balance and Wolverine World Wide, the other qualifying manufacturer.


Wolverine World Wide, based in Rockford, Mich., makes brands including Saucony, Patagonia, Hush Puppies and Keds.


Five other American companies have begun making shoes to the military’s specifications, Tsongas’ office said.



Fort Benning identifies soldier who died after ruck march




Fort Benning, Ga., on Monday identified a National Guard member who died after a training march during the weekend as Pvt. Aurek S. Rardin, 20, of Tennessee.


Rardin, assigned to the 198th Infantry Brigade, was participating in basic training. He vomited and lost his pulse following a “ruck march,” Muscogee County Coroner Buddy Bryan said. Officials revived Rardin at a military hospital and then transported him to St. Francis Hospital in Columbus, Ga., where he was pronounced dead early Saturday morning.


A Fort Benning spokeswoman said the military is investigating the cause of his death.




Monday, April 28, 2014

US imposes new sanctions on Russian energy barons


WASHINGTON — The Obama administration sought to tighten the noose on the Russian economy Monday, imposing new economic sanctions against 17 companies and seven associates of President Vladimir Putin for Russia’s failure to keep promises made in recent Ukraine peace talks.


President Barack Obama announced the new asset freezes and visa bans against rich or politically connected members of Putin’s inner circle at a news conference in Manila, Philippines, where he was completing a four-nation tour of Asia. He said the sanctions were intended to chastise Russia for not matching U.S. and European efforts to ease tensions in Ukraine under an April 17 agreement reached in Geneva.


“We have not seen comparable efforts by the Russians, and as a consequence, we are going to be moving forward with an expanded list of individuals and companies that will be affected by sanctions,” Obama said. “They remain targeted. We will also focus on some areas of high-tech defense exports to Russia that we don’t think are appropriate to be exporting in this kind of climate.”


Although the new sanctions don’t target Russia’s energy sector — Obama said that step would be taken if Russian troops crossed the border into Ukraine — they take aim at individuals whose wealth comes largely from Russia’s vast oil and natural gas industry. The reluctance to impose broad sanctions on Russian sales of oil and natural gas reflects concerns that such a step would cripple Europe’s economic recovery — the European Union is deeply dependent on Russian energy — and likely drive up global oil prices, which would hurt U.S. consumers and slow the U.S. economy ahead of hotly contested midterm elections in November.


The sanctions also don’t target Putin. “The goal here is not to go after Mr. Putin, personally,” Obama said. “The goal is to change his calculus with how the current actions he’s engaging in in Ukraine could have an adverse impact on the Russian economy.”


“It seems to me a pretty modest step,” said Michael Singh, a former senior national security adviser in the Bush administration, who thinks the administration’s approach has emboldened rather than punished Putin. “You have to be willing to show that you are ultimately willing to incur a cost to deter Russia.”


Republicans expressed similar dissatisfaction, with Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, referring to the new sanctions as “just a slap on the wrist.”


“Until Putin feels the real pain of sanctions targeting entities like Gazprom — which the Kremlin uses to coerce Ukraine and other neighbors — as well as some significant financial institutions, I don’t think diplomacy will change Russian behavior and de-escalate this crisis,” he said. Gazprom, a major Russian energy consortium, provides natural gas to Ukraine and much of Europe


Senior administration officials, speaking only on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss the crisis freely, acknowledged that sanctions won’t have an immediate effect. But they said that over time the sanctions would damage Russia’s already troubled economy and that would persuade Putin to change course.


“It’s important that together with the additional prospect of sectoral sanctions, Russia sees the dead end that it’s going down in Ukraine and, frankly, the fact that their interests will be severely compromised and set back in the world if they continue down this course,” said one of the officials.


Russian officials condemned the move as “revolting” and vowed to retaliate against Washington.


“We will respond, although it is not our choice,” the Itar-Tass news agency cited Sergey Ryabkov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister, as saying. “But we can’t leave this situation without reaction, without practical reaction, without reaction by means of our own decisions. U.S. behavior in the field is becoming provocative.”


Under the sanctions, seven individuals will have their U.S. assets frozen and will be prohibited from traveling to the United States. Seventeen companies also will have their assets frozen. In a new wrinkle, the administration imposed requirements for the sales of high-tech equipment to 13 of the 17 newly sanctioned companies. These licensing efforts will begin with the “presumption of denial” to prevent Russian companies from buying anything that “could contribute to Russia’s military capabilities.” Already existing licenses for the sale of such equipment will be canceled, the White House said.


The most prominent individual blacklisted under the sanctions is Igor Sechin, the head of energy giant Rosneft, Russia’s leading petroleum company. Rosneft has tentacles across global oil markets, including several joint ventures with Texas-based Exxon Mobil. The sanctions would freeze any assets held in the United States by Sechin, a former deputy prime minister and former chief of staff to Putin. Rosneft’s assets would remain unaffected.


Monday’s sanctions also target Sergei Chemezov, a close Putin friend, ally and longtime head of the Russian state-owned company charged with developing, manufacturing and exporting high-tech industrial products. The sanctions target Chemezov personally but not his company, known by the acronym Rostec.


Another important target Monday was Yevgeny Murov, an elderly and influential army general who heads the Russian federal protective services unit.


The four other Putin allies sanctioned include Moscow’s new envoy to Crimea, the Ukrainian territory that Russia annexed last month.


The 17 companies targeted are tied to individuals who were hit with a round of sanctions imposed March 20. They include InvestCapitalBank and SMP Bank, controlled by brothers Arkady and Boris Rotenberg, Putin allies who won lucrative contracts tied to Russia’s hosting of the recent Winter Olympics. Also sanctioned was Stroygazmontazh, also known as the SGM Group, a gas pipeline construction company owned or controlled by Arkady Rotenberg.


Hitting at a wealthy energy mogul, the Treasury sanctioned the Volga Group, whose sole investor is Gennady Timchenko, who was also sanctioned March 20. Volga Group is an investment group that holds interest in a variety of Timchenko assets including natural gas, timber, railroads and financial services. The sanctions affect Transoil, an oil transportation company, as well as nine other companies tied to the Volga Group.


The remaining three companies — Abro, CJSC Zest and JSB Sobinbank — are tied to Bank Rossiya, which was also targeted in March.


Lesley Clark and Lindsay Wise in Washington and Stuart Leavenworth in Manila, Philippines, contributed to this report.