MARKHAM, Ill. (Tribune News Service) — The judge was only halfway through his ruling Wednesday when it became clear that Park Forest Police Officer Craig Taylor would not be held criminally responsible for firing beanbag rounds at a knife-wielding World War II veteran who died hours later of internal bleeding.
In describing Taylor’s actions that night in July 2013, Cook County Associate Judge Luciano Panici began using terms like “fearing for his life” and “reasonable use of force.”
But Taylor continued to listen calmly, eyes downcast at the defense table, the courtroom gallery behind him packed with uniformed cops showing their support. It wasn’t until Panici uttered the words “not guilty” that the 10-year veteran officer dropped his head and sobbed for a moment, then jumped up and hugged his wife tightly, his face buried in her shoulder.
Across the courtroom, relatives of the 95-year-old victim, John Wrana Jr., held each other in the Markham courtroom, tears in their eyes.
Taylor’s acquittal on a single felony count of reckless conduct marked a dramatic end to a case that highlighted the difficulty of proving criminal charges against an officer who insisted he had acted out of fear for his life and that of other officers with him.
An agitated Wrana had holed up in his room at the Victory Centre assisted living facility in the south suburb and threatened to kill the police.
The judge’s verdict was a blow for State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez, who has brought several cases against police officers in recent years in what she has said is a stepped-up effort to hold police accountable when they cross the line.
After the verdict, Alvarez defended bringing the charge against Taylor, saying that she truly believed his actions were reckless and that the trial “shed a light on police procedures.”
“I really think other actions could have been taken and more restraint shown,” Alvarez told reporters after attending an unrelated sentencing at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago.
Taylor, 44, had faced anywhere from probation up to three years in prison if convicted.
The case against Taylor unfolded amid national scrutiny on police use-of-force tactics sparked by the high-profile deaths of two unarmed black men in Missouri and New York. While lacking the racial element of those controversial cases, Taylor’s trial focused on a similar theme: When should an officer’s use of force be considered excessive?
In his ruling, Panici said the legal answer to that question requires thinking about the use of force “from the perspective of the officer, not the 20/20 vision of hindsight.”
Noting that Taylor’s commander — who was not charged — had come up with the plan to have Taylor shoot beanbag rounds from a shotgun if Wrana continued to disobey commands, Panici said Taylor’s decision to fire five shots in rapid succession was “not excessive.”
“He was faced with an advancing individual with a knife over his head, threatening to kill him and his fellow police officers,” Panici said. “There was nothing criminal about his actions.”
Alvarez said prosecutors considered charging the officer’s supervisor as well but ultimately decided against it after a “legal analysis of accountability.”
“Based on the facts and the law, we felt that the charges should only be brought against the officer who actually took the actions,” she said.
After the ruling, Taylor’s lawyer, Terry Ekl, told reporters it was a “shame” that Taylor had to go through the trauma of being arrested, handcuffed and brought to court. But he also said that by having the facts aired out in court, the public was able to see that Taylor “did absolutely nothing wrong.”
Asked how the indictment had impacted Taylor, Ekl said, “He has not had a good night’s sleep since the day he found out he was being indicted. He wakes up in the middle of the night. It’s had a terrible effect on him emotionally.”
Taylor, who has been on desk duty since being charged last April, hopes to return to active duty, but he still faces a multimillion-dollar wrongful-death lawsuit brought by Wrana’s family in U.S. District Court. Ekl said he would not let Taylor publicly comment on his acquittal because of the pending lawsuit.
The Wrana family had no comment on the verdict. But in a statement issued to the Chicago Tribune on Wednesday afternoon, their attorney in the lawsuit said the family “looks towards their day in federal court where they believe that all (of) the persons responsible for John Wrana’s homicide will be held accountable under the civil law.”
Prosecutors argued during the three-day bench trial in January that Taylor and four other officers had rushed to judgment the night they were called to Wrana’s room, deciding within minutes to employ a “violent extrication” that led to Wrana’s death.
According to trial testimony, officers had twice gone into Wrana’s room, only to retreat after he threatened them — first with a long, red-handled shoehorn and his black metal cane, later with a filleting knife with a 7-inch blade.
Cmdr. Michael Baugh conferred outside Wrana’s apartment with Cpl. Lloyd Elliot, then instructed the group to form a “stack” — a staggered, single-file line — to enter Wrana’s home, with Baugh in the lead carrying a shield and Taser, according to testimony.
Baugh ordered Wrana to drop the knife. When he didn’t, the commander fired the Taser, but its prongs missed.
Taylor, who was second in the line, twice ordered Wrana to drop the knife and then fired the beanbag rounds. Four rounds struck Wrana, who dropped the knife into a small plastic garbage can after being struck in the hand by the final shot.
Wrana died five hours later after refusing surgery to repair an intestine that was torn and other injuries that caused massive internal bleeding.
In the trial’s emotional highlight, Taylor testified that he feared for his life and those of his fellow officers when Wrana took a shuffling step forward with the knife raised. Taylor said that after the first shot or two failed to stop Wrana, he thought he had the authority to use lethal force — opening fire with his handgun — but chose not to, in part because of Wrana’s advanced age.
Prosecutors alleged Taylor fired the rounds from a much closer range than called for during training. Their case also rested heavily on Francis Murphy, a former Secret Service supervisor who testified that the officers had other options and escalated the confrontation by storming Wrana’s room.
Murphy testified the officers could have used their ballistic shield to knock Wrana to the ground, deployed pepper spray to disable him or simply retreated and allowed him time to cool off.
But the judge blasted those assertions in his ruling, saying staff at the facility had been trying to calm him down “for the entire day” to no avail.
“The evidence clearly indicated that Mr. Wrana had become more agitated as time progressed,” Panici said.
———
©2015 Chicago Tribune
Visit the Chicago Tribune at http://ift.tt/sYd3cl
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC
No comments:
Post a Comment